Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters
- PMID: 12745981
- DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000109214
Applying image descriptors to the assessment of legibility in Chinese characters
Abstract
The current study derived seven descriptors from the pixel matrix of 5401 Chinese characters in the commonly used Ming, Kai, Li, and Hei fonts. A factor analysis was used to reduce the number of descriptors for a validation experiment. The three-factor solution (number of strokes, character height, and character width) explaining 89.54% of the variance was derived from 5401 characters in four fonts. A 4 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial experiment using fonts, number of strokes, character height, and character width as the independent variables was conducted to evaluate the impact of each critical factor on the legibility of Chinese characters. Each tested character was chosen from the 500 most commonly used characters to minimize the effect of familiarity and ensure that all participants could recognize the character if it was legible. The 16 university students who participated in the experiment were asked to identify a Chinese character initially displayed on a PC screen at its minimum size and enlarged gradually until the participant could recognize it. The analysis of variance suggests that all the main effects of font, number of strokes, character height, and character width are significant. The legibility thresholds of the four type styles from the most to the least legible are in the Hei, Ming, Kai, and Li sequence. Number of strokes is the only significant factor in predicting the legibility threshold for each individual font. However, if predicting the legibility threshold across four fonts, character height is the other significant factor with about the same predictive power as number of strokes. The legible threshold is increased by the number of strokes and decreased by the character height and character width.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of English letters' legibility using image descriptors.Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Oct;107(2):618-28. doi: 10.2466/pms.107.2.618-628. Percept Mot Skills. 2008. PMID: 19093622
-
The effects of age, viewing distance, display type, font type, colour contrast and number of syllables on the legibility of Korean characters.Ergonomics. 2011 May;54(5):453-65. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.568635. Ergonomics. 2011. PMID: 21547790
-
[Selection of Chinese characters for visual acuity charts using psychophysical methods].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;47(7):618-22. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22041487 Chinese.
-
Text legibility and the letter superiority effect.Hum Factors. 2005 Winter;47(4):797-815. doi: 10.1518/001872005775570998. Hum Factors. 2005. PMID: 16553067
-
Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding.Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.021. Epub 2008 Nov 7. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 18929592 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The effects of text direction of different text lengths on Chinese reading.Sci Rep. 2023 May 29;13(1):8660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35859-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37248273 Free PMC article.
-
Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests.Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 4;9(1):3338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30833715 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the minimum spatial-frequency content for recognizing Chinese and alphabet characters.J Vis. 2018 Jan 1;18(1):1. doi: 10.1167/18.1.1. J Vis. 2018. PMID: 29297056 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Ambient Illumination and Text Color on Visual Fatigue under Negative Polarity.Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 30;24(11):3516. doi: 10.3390/s24113516. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38894307 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources