[Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. What could we propose according to their treatment?]
- PMID: 12746623
[Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. What could we propose according to their treatment?]
Abstract
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is well acknowledged in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). However, although its use is widely recommended in some developed countries, with a significant economical cost, SMBG remains questionable in type 2 DM because its efficacy is not demonstrated by high-quality randomized controlled trials. Type 2 diabetes is an heterogenous disease and its natural history covers several decades. Although type 2 DM represents an important risk of microvascular and cardiovascular complications, it remains asymptomatic for a long time with often a very poor metabolic control and low drug compliance. Treatment of type 2 diabetes varies during these decades, changes in lifestyle at the very beginning, then using oral drugs without risk to develop hypoglycemia (metformin, glitazones, alpha-glucosidases inhibitors) and/or insulin secreting drugs (sulfonylureas or glinides) with potential hypoglycemic risks. At every stage, SMBG could sensitize the patient and possibly could improve glycemias and compliance. SMBG must be adapted to provide informations representing a very useful, motivating and pedagogic tool. Obviously SMBG, in non-insulin-treated type 2 DM, targets other objectives when compared to its use in type 1 DM requiring adapted educational programs to avoid its uselessness and depression of the patient. In insulin treated type 2 DM patients, with a bed time regimen, SMBG represents both a major tool for adjusting the insulin and oral hypoglycemic drugs doses and a comprehensive instrument for controlling and understanding the disease. Thus SMBG is a logical tool for the management of a large proportion of type 2 DM patients but it requires to be proposed in structured counseling educational programs adapted to the psychological and social profile of the patients. These programs must be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.
Similar articles
-
Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006 Jul;114(7):384-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924152. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006. PMID: 16915542
-
Self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes living in France: the Entred study 2001.Diabetes Metab. 2008 Jun;34(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Mar 17. Diabetes Metab. 2008. PMID: 18343703
-
Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study.Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1764-70. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0268. Diabetes Care. 2006. PMID: 16873777 Clinical Trial.
-
Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes: is it worth it?Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Jul;46(Pt 4):273-82. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009011. Epub 2009 May 19. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009. PMID: 19454538 Review.
-
[Benefits of blood glucose self-monitoring in the management of insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Analysis of the literature: mixed results].Diabetes Metab. 1998 Nov;24 Suppl 3:35-41. Diabetes Metab. 1998. PMID: 9881230 Review. French.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical