doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051.
Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent
- PMID: 12750185
- PMCID: PMC1125976
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051
Item in Clipboard
Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent
BMJ.
.
No abstract available
Figures
Many doctors did not realise that they were breaking the law by failing
to seek the consent of relatives for the retention of brains for
research GEOFF TOMPKINSON/SPL
Similar articles
-
Human tissue bill.Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Dec-2004 Jan;(194):22-4. Bull Med Ethics. 2003. PMID: 15832472 No abstract available.
-
A dispute over brain donations: families allege improper consent in lawsuits against Bethesda institute.Washington Post. 2005 Jun 30:B1, B5. Washington Post. 2005. PMID: 16060024 No abstract available.
-
Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention.J Leg Med. 2005 Dec;26(4):475-90. doi: 10.1080/01947640500364739. J Leg Med. 2005. PMID: 16303735 Review. No abstract available.
-
Inquiry shows British scientists took brains without families' consent.N Y Times Web. 2003 May 13:A8. N Y Times Web. 2003. PMID: 12812165 No abstract available.
-
Human experimentation. Legal regulation and ethical justification in Germany.Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2002 Jul-Dec;(17):57-74. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2002. PMID: 12703108 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances.J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7. Epub 2010 May 16. J Neurooncol. 2011. PMID: 20473723
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
