Point: From animal models to prevention of colon cancer. Systematic review of chemoprevention in min mice and choice of the model system
- PMID: 12750232
- PMCID: PMC2797538
Point: From animal models to prevention of colon cancer. Systematic review of chemoprevention in min mice and choice of the model system
Abstract
The Apc(Min/+) mouse model and the azoxymethane (AOM) rat model are the main animal models used to study the effect of dietary agents on colorectal cancer. We reviewed recently the potency of chemopreventive agents in the AOM rat model (D. E. Corpet and S. Tache, Nutr. Cancer, 43: 1-21, 2002). Here we add the results of a systematic review of the effect of dietary and chemopreventive agents on the tumor yield in Min mice. The review is based on the results of 179 studies from 71 articles and is displayed also on the internet http://corpet.net/min.(2) We compared the efficacy of agents in the Min mouse model and the AOM rat model, and found that they were correlated (r = 0.66; P < 0.001), although some agents that afford strong protection in the AOM rat and the Min mouse small bowel increase the tumor yield in the large bowel of mutant mice. The agents included piroxicam, sulindac, celecoxib, difluoromethylornithine, and polyethylene glycol. The reason for this discrepancy is not known. We also compare the results of rodent studies with those of clinical intervention studies of polyp recurrence. We found that the effect of most of the agents tested was consistent across the animal and clinical models. Our point is thus: rodent models can provide guidance in the selection of prevention approaches to human colon cancer, in particular they suggest that polyethylene glycol, hesperidin, protease inhibitor, sphingomyelin, physical exercise, epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor, (+)-catechin, resveratrol, fish oil, curcumin, caffeate, and thiosulfonate are likely important preventive agents.
Figures
Comment in
-
Counterpoint: From animal models to prevention of colon cancer. Criteria for proceeding from preclinical studies and choice of models for prevention studies.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 May;12(5):401-4. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003. PMID: 12750233 Review.
References
-
- Jacoby RF, Cole CE, Lubet RA, You M. Effect of the nonspecific Cox1/2 inhibitor piroxicam and the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor difluoromethylornitine (DFMO) on development of intestinal tumors in mice bearing germline alteration the the Msh2 or APC genes. Proc AACR. 2001;42:1422.
-
- Yang K, Fan K, Shinozaki H, Newmark H, Edelmann W, Kucherlapati R, Lipkin M. Sulindac increases carcinoma development in the colons of mice with Apc mutations. Proc AACR. 1999;40:3488.
-
- Yang K, Fan K, Lia M, Edelmann W, Augenlicht LH, Lubet R, Kopelovich L, Kucherlapati R, Lipkin M. Sulindac Increases Tumor Development in the Colon of Mice with Mlh1 +/− Mutation. Proc AACR. 2001;42:1423.
-
- Thun MJ, Henley J, Patrono C. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents: mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical issues. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:252–266. - PubMed
-
- Dashwood RH, Suzui M, Nakagama H, Sugimura T, Nagao M. High frequency of beta-catenin (Ctnnb1) mutations in the colon tumors induced by two heterocyclic amines in the F344 rat. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1127–1129. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials