Choice of a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis for AVR: does CABG matter?
- PMID: 12754019
- DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00085-x
Choice of a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis for AVR: does CABG matter?
Abstract
Objective: Mechanical valves and bioprostheses are the commonly used devices in aortic valve replacement (AVR). Many patients with valvular disease also require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used a microsimulation model to provide insight into the outcomes of patients after AVR with mechanical valves and stented bioprostheses, with and without CABG, and to determine the age-thresholds or age crossover points in outcomes between the two valve types.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of published results after primary AVR with mechanical prostheses (nine reports, 4274 patients, 25,726 patient-years) and stented porcine bioprostheses (13 reports, 9007 patients, 54,151 patient-years) to estimate risks of valve-related events. A hazard ratio of 1.3 was used to incorporate the effect of CABG on long-term survival. Estimates were entered into a microsimulation model, which was then used to predict the outcomes of patients after AVR, with and without CABG. The model calculations were validated using a large data set from Portland, USA.
Results: For a 65-year-old male without CABG, the life expectancy (LE) was 11.2 and 11.6 years and the event-free life expectancy (EFLE) was 8.2 and 8.9 years, respectively, after implantation with mechanical valves and bioprostheses. The lifetime risk of at least one valve-related event was 51 and 47%, respectively. The age crossover point between the two valve types, considering the above outcome parameters, was 59, 60 and 63 years, respectively. CABG reduced LE and consequently EFLE and lifetime risk of an event, but only minimally influenced the patient age crossover points. The model calculations showed good agreement with the Portland data.
Conclusions: The currently recommended patient age for using a bioprosthesis (65 years) could be lowered further, irrespective of concomitant CABG. The trade-off between the reduced risks of bioprosthetic failure and of hemorrhage in mechanical valves, resulting from a lower LE, minimized the effect of CABG on the age crossover points between the two valve types.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1172-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.013102. Heart. 2004. PMID: 15367517 Free PMC article.
-
Microsimulation and clinical outcomes analysis support a lower age threshold for use of biological valves.Heart. 2010 Nov;96(21):1730-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.201939. Heart. 2010. PMID: 20956488 Review.
-
Long-Term Survival After Bovine Pericardial Versus Porcine Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Does Valve Choice Matter?Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;100(2):550-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.067. Epub 2015 May 16. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25986098
-
Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Mar;25(3):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.013. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15019662
-
Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Meta-analysis and microsimulation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;157(6):2189-2197.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Oct 22. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30501946
Cited by
-
Does preservation of the sub-valvular apparatus during mitral valve replacement affect long-term survival and quality of life? A Microsimulation Study.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr 23;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-3-17. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18433480 Free PMC article.
-
When is concomitant aortic valve replacement indicated in patients with mild to moderate stenosis undergoing coronary revascularization?Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005 Mar;7(2):101-4. doi: 10.1007/s11886-005-0020-8. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005. PMID: 15717955 Review.
-
Comparison of models for predicting outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease focusing on microsimulation.Int J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;3(8):522-30. Int J Prev Med. 2012. PMID: 22973481 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical