Reducing sample sizes when comparing experimental and control groups
- PMID: 1275563
- DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1976.10667213
Reducing sample sizes when comparing experimental and control groups
Abstract
In comparing rates for two groups (one control and the other experimental), one may use an historical control to reduce the sample size needed for a test of significance to one-fourth that required if the control is not historical. If there is some doubt as to whether one's control is comparable to the historical control, a test showing the equality of the historical and experimental controls can lead to a halving of the sample required for significance testing. This same argument also applies to the comparison of two means.
Similar articles
-
Monitoring rare serious adverse events from a new treatment and testing for a difference from historical controls.Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):598-610. doi: 10.1177/1740774507084978. Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 18042569
-
Sample size considerations for studies comparing survival curves using historical controls.J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(12):1209-13. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90025-x. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988. PMID: 3062140 Clinical Trial.
-
Reducing sample size in experiments with animals: historical controls and related strategies.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):431-445. doi: 10.1111/brv.12237. Epub 2015 Nov 13. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017. PMID: 26565143
-
A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data.Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Jun;26(3):1323-1340. doi: 10.1177/0962280215577111. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017. PMID: 25834090 Review.
-
Practical issues in survey sampling.Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998 Mar-May;15(3):38-45. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9807275 Review.
Cited by
-
Designing and analysing clinical trials in mental health: an evidence synthesis approach.Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Nov;19(4):114-117. doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102491. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Evid Based Ment Health. 2016. PMID: 27935810 Free PMC article.