Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976 May;183(5):556-65.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-197605000-00013.

The curative treatment of carcinoma of the sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum

The curative treatment of carcinoma of the sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum

S M Wilson et al. Ann Surg. 1976 May.

Abstract

This retrospective series comprises 902 patients who underwent curative resection of the sigmoid colon, rectosigmoid, and upper rectum at the Mayo Clinic during the years 1959 to 1969. Lesions were divided according to the location from the dentate line, with 346 patients having had a lesion located more than 20 cm from the dentate line; in the remaining 556 patients, the lesion was between 6 and 20 cm distant. A thorough analysis was undertaken comparing these two groups of patients on the basis of operative mortality and morbidity, including anastomotic complications, 5- and 10-year survival, and incidence of local recurrence. Overall operative mortality was 1.9%, with an 8.1% incidence of anastomotic complications. The overall 5-year survival rate was 72% and the 10-year survival rate was 55%. The incidence of anastomotic recurrence for anastomosis performed with the use of extraperitoneal rectum was 5.8%; recurrence at the suture line developed in 2.9% of patients who underwent anastomosis to serosa-covered bowel. In addition to the above data, information will be presented which demonstrates the effect of the patient's height and weight on the surgeon's ability to perform a low-anterior anastomosis. Finally, the incidence of anastomotic complications and of local recurrence were analyzed according to the intestinal preparation employed, the use of parenteral antibiotics , and the method of drainage used near the anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J. 1963 Jul 6;2(5348):13-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1965 May;90:793-8 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1958 Feb;34(2):313-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1955 Oct;142(4):752-7 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954 Oct;99(4):421-30 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources