The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in Thai men with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study
- PMID: 12757058
The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in Thai men with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study in Thai men with erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology and more than 6 months' duration.
Material and method: 125 patients aged 26 to 77 years were randomized at 4 centers in Thailand to receive either sildenafil citrate (50 mg initially, increased if necessary up to 100 mg or decreased to 25 mg depending on efficacy and/or tolerability) (n = 63) or a matching placebo (n = 62) taken on an 'as needed' basis approximately 1 hour prior to anticipated sexual activity for a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the patients' responses to the 15-question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), to questions on the event log of sexual activity, and to the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections.
Results: At the conclusion of the study, both the primary efficacy variables relating to the achievement and maintenance of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and the secondary efficacy variables, which included the 5 separate domains of sexual functioning of the IIEF, the percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse, and the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections, were all significantly improved statistically by sildenafil in comparison with placebo except in the sexual desire domain which showed no difference. The percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse in the sildenafil group was 66.16 per cent while in the placebo group it was 33.05 per cent. The percentage of global efficacy assessment was improved in the sildenafil group by 82.5 per cent compared to 36.1 per cent in the placebo group. Adverse events considered treatment-related occurred in 19 patients (30.2%) receiving sildenafil and 7 (11.3%) receiving placebo. The most common adverse events with sildenafil were vasodilatation (flushing), headache, and dizziness, which occurred in 14.3 per cent, 6.3 per cent, and 6.3 per cent of patients respectively. All events were mild in nature.
Conclusions: Sildenafil is a safe and effective treatment for erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology in Thai men. Its efficacy appears similar to that reported in other studies in Western populations.
Similar articles
-
ASSESS-3: a randomised, double-blind, flexible-dose clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction in Taiwan.Int J Impot Res. 2001 Aug;13(4):221-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900685. Int J Impot Res. 2001. PMID: 11494079 Clinical Trial.
-
A double-blind, randomised- placebo, controlled, parallel group, multicentre, flexible-dose escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administered as required to male outpatients with erectile dysfunction in Korea.Int J Impot Res. 2003 Apr;15(2):80-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900944. Int J Impot Res. 2003. PMID: 12789384 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela: a double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.Int J Impot Res. 2002 Aug;14 Suppl 2:S42-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900897. Int J Impot Res. 2002. PMID: 12161767 Clinical Trial.
-
Erectile function and assessments of erection hardness correlate positively with measures of emotional well-being, sexual satisfaction, and treatment satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate (Viagra).Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3 Suppl):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.027. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17011373 Review.
-
Erection hardness: a unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3 Suppl):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.041. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17011372 Review.
Cited by
-
Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.BMC Urol. 2005 Dec 14;5:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-5-18. BMC Urol. 2005. PMID: 16354303 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of the Orally Disintegrating Strip Sildenafil for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.Sex Med. 2021 Dec;9(6):100453. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100453. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 34710784 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and medical management of erectile dysfunction in Asia.Asian J Androl. 2011 Jul;13(4):543-9. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.131. Epub 2011 Apr 4. Asian J Androl. 2011. PMID: 21460862 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medical management of erectile dysfunction in aging males: is it too late to treat?Asian J Androl. 2014 Jan-Feb;16(1):153-6. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122580. Asian J Androl. 2014. PMID: 24369150 Free PMC article.
-
Erectile dysfunction.BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jun 29;2011:1803. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011. PMID: 21711956 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical