Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Mar;18(1):29-34.
doi: 10.1076/soph.18.1.29.14069.

Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations and visual performance between photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations and visual performance between photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

Sayuri Ninomiya et al. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

The purpose was to compare the ocular higher-order aberrations and the visual performance between photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Ocular aberrations and visual performance were measured after PRK in 26 eyes, after LASIK in 39 eyes, and in 29 normal myopic control eyes. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Visual performance was evaluated with grating contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity under full correction with spectacles. The results were that the root mean square (RMS) values of ocular higher-order aberrations after PRK or LASIK were significantly greater than that of normal controls for both 4-mm and 6-mm zones (PRK; 0.22 +/- 0.09 and 0.85 +/- 0.24 microm, LASIK; 0.20 +/- 0.06 and 0.82 +/- 0.24 microm, normal; 0.10 +/- 0.03 and 0.33 +/- 0.11 microm. P < 0.05 between PRK and normal, LASIK and normal, One Way ANOVA on Ranks). There were no significant differences between PRK and LASIK. The ocular higher-order aberrations increased in proportion with the attempted refractive correction by PRK and LASIK. The ocular higher-order aberrations correlated better with grating contrast sensitivity, low contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity than with high contrast visual acuity. There was no difference among normal, PRK and LASIK in all the visual function tests, except between normal and PRK, or between normal and LASIK with letter contrast sensitivity. In conclusion, there was no difference in both ocular higher-order aberrations and visual performance between PRK and LASIK. The result suggests that surgeons can choose refractive procedures according to the corneal conditions or daily activities of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources