Usefulness of intravenous metoprolol during positive isoproterenol tilt-table test in the choice of treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope
- PMID: 12760586
Usefulness of intravenous metoprolol during positive isoproterenol tilt-table test in the choice of treatment for neurocardiogenic syncope
Abstract
Background: Isoproterenol tilt-table testing provides a diagnosis of neurocardiogenic syncope in patients with syncope or near-syncope. Although acute beta-blockade may prevent the development of syncope during isoproterenol tilt-table testing, the use of beta-blockers for chronic prophylaxis may not be effective for some patients who show a positive response to isoproterenol tilt-table testing. We evaluated whether the efficacy of intravenous metoprolol in preventing symptoms during repeated tests would be helpful in selecting patients suitable for long-term therapy.
Methods and results: We studied 55 patients (35 females, 20 males; mean age 36+/-11 years) who had been chosen from a group referred to our institute with a history of unexplained syncope (> or = 2 syncopal episodes) and a positive response to isoproterenol tilt-table testing. After a positive response to isoproterenol tilt-table testing, 5 mg metoprolol was infused intravenously as a bolus and the test repeated. Thirty-five patients (group 1) showed a positive response again and 20 (group 2) showed a negative response. We started 50 mg metoprolol once a day for patients in group 1 while group 2 was divided into 2 subgroups: the first subgroup (group 2a, 12 patients) was started on 50 mg sertraline or 20 mg paroxetine once a day and the second subgroup (group 2b, 8 patients) was started on 5 mg midodrine orally once a day. Two months later, isoproterenol tilt-table testing was repeated. In group 1, 13 of 35 patients (37%) were positive on isoproterenol tilt-table testing while in group 2, 8 of 20 patients (40%) were positive on isoproterenol tilt-table testing (p not statistically significant). The therapies of the two groups were then interchanged. Two months later (4 months from the beginning of the study), the isoproterenol tilt-table test was repeated. Eleven patients in group 1 (31%) and 6 in group 2 (30%, p not statistically significant) showed a positive response again.
Conclusions: We conclude that acute beta-blockade response to positive isoproterenol tilt-table testing is not a useful predictor for the assessment of chronic prophylaxis for neurocardiogenic syncope.
Similar articles
-
The usefulness of tilt testing with an intravenous beta-blocker in assessing the efficacy of long-term therapy in patients with vasovagal syncope.Kardiol Pol. 2003 Aug;59(8):93-104; commentary 103-4. Kardiol Pol. 2003. PMID: 14560324
-
Acute and long-term beta-adrenergic blockade for patients with neurocardiogenic syncope.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;26(5):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00320-7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995. PMID: 7594046 Clinical Trial.
-
Tilt-table testing and oral metoprolol therapy in young patients with unexplained syncope.Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):278-83. Pediatrics. 1994. PMID: 8121741
-
[Tilt test in the etiological diagnosis of syncope unexplained by electrophysiological study].Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1994 Nov;43(9):503-10. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1994. PMID: 7864553 Review. French.
-
[The tilt-table test: is it essential for adequate treatment of vasovagal syncope? Arguments against].Rev Esp Cardiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):374-82. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1997. PMID: 9304160 Review. Spanish.