Similar articles

• Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: rate and rhythm management.

  Gillis AM, Verma A, Talajic M, Nattel S, Dorian P; CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. Gillis AM, et al. Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2010.11.001. Can J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21329862
• Atrial fibrillation: rate control often better than rhythm control.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Prescrire Int. 2004 Apr;13(70):64-9. Prescrire Int. 2004. PMID: 15148984
• Rate control at least as effective as rhythm control for AF patients.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Geriatrics. 2002 May;57(5):63. Geriatrics. 2002. PMID: 12040594 No abstract available.
• Is either sotalol or amiodarone more effective than digoxin for converting patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm within 48 hours?

  Forney AJ, Schooff M. Forney AJ, et al. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):982. J Fam Pract. 2000. PMID: 11093561 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
• Rate control in atrial fibrillation.

  Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Crijns HJ, Olshansky B. Van Gelder IC, et al. Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):818-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31258-2. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27560277 Review.