Why clinical information standards matter

Editorial

Martin Gardner. BMJ. 2003.

. 2003 May 24;326(7399):1101-2.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1101.

No abstract available

Comment on

Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice.
Brown PJ, Warmington V, Laurence M, Prevost AT. Brown PJ, et al. BMJ. 2003 May 24;326(7399):1127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1127. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12763986 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers.
Gray J, Orr D, Majeed A. Gray J, et al. BMJ. 2003 May 24;326(7399):1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1130. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12763987 Free PMC article.

1. Brown PJB, Warmington V, Laurence M, Prevost AT. Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice. BMJ 2003;326: 1127-30. - PMC - PubMed
1. Gray J, Orr D, Majeed A. Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers. BMJ 2003;326: 1130-2. - PMC - PubMed
1. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Beebe C, Biron PV, Boyer SL, Essin D, et al. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8: 552-69. - PMC - PubMed
1. Gardner M, Peachey T. A standard XML schema for computerised anaesthetic records. Anaesthesia 2002;57: 1174-82. - PubMed
1. Woolman PS. XML for electronic clinical communications in Scotland. Int J Med Inf 2001;64: 379-83. - PubMed