Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003;5(2):333-42.
doi: 10.1081/jcmr-120019422.

Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using fast steady-state cine MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using fast steady-state cine MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography

Yasutaka Ichikawa et al. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003.

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging consistently underestimated angiographic measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR imaging with steady-state free precession acquisition (SSFP) can provide improved accuracy and reproducibility in measuring cardiac function in comparison with fast spoiled gradient echo cine MR imaging (SPGR). Twenty patients with cardiovascular diseases who underwent breath-hold cine MR imaging within one week of LV angiography were studied. Two sets of breath-hold cine MR images were obtained, one with SSFP and another with SPGR. The LV volumes determined by two breath-hold cine MR sequences were compared with the results by LV angiography. SPGR cine MR imaging consistently underestimated angiographic LV volumes. The mean difference of LV end-diastolic volume was -22.5 +/- 14.8 ml (p < 0.001) for short-axis planes and -27.7 +/- 21.5 ml (p < 0.001) for long-axis planes. In contrast, LV volumes measured by the SSFP imaging showed a good agreement with the results by angiography. The mean difference of LV end-diastolic volume was -2.5 +/- 14.3 ml (p = N.S.) for short-axis planes and -10.9 +/- 15.1 ml (p < 0.01) for long-axis planes. Standard error of the estimation in measuring LV end-diastolic volume with the SSFP imaging was 3.9% for short-axis images and 4.9% for long-axis images. These values were 7.2% and 8.7% with the SPGR imaging. In conclusion, the SSFP acquisition can provide accurate and noninvasive assessments of LV volumes and ejection fraction within a reduced imaging time.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources