Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials
- PMID: 12767583
- DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00078-8
Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials
Abstract
Communication between patients and physicians likely mediates traditional patient and physician predispositions in determining patient outcomes, including perceptions and decision making. However, the extent to which a mediating effect occurs is unclear. The purpose of this essay is to outline the need for conceptualizing more holistic models of consumer-provider interaction that demonstrate the role of the therapeutic relationship in treatment outcomes. We focus on an important communicative context for exploring this question: the situation where patients, with the help of oncologists, are faced with making treatment choices, particularly whether to enroll in a clinical trial in response to their life-threatening cancer diagnosis. We explore the question from the perspectives of the medical provider, the patient, and the accompanying family member, in order to better frame the complex interactional dynamics occurring during the interaction.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between outpatients' perceptions of physicians' communication styles and patients' anxiety levels in a Japanese oncology setting.Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(10):1335-50. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00413-5. Soc Sci Med. 2001. PMID: 11676404
-
Communication in cancer care: recent developments.J Palliat Care. 2002 Winter;18(4):300-6. J Palliat Care. 2002. PMID: 12611322 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Patient-centered communication in the physician-patient relationship].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Sep;55(9):1106-12. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1528-x. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012. PMID: 22936477 German.
-
Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision making on participation in clinical trials.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2666-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8114. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18509178 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 31. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16139467 Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0160-4. J Cancer Educ. 2011. PMID: 20862574 Review.
-
Perceptions of participation in a phase I, II, or III clinical trial among African American patients with cancer: what do refusers say?J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6):287-93. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001039. Epub 2013 Oct 15. J Oncol Pract. 2013. PMID: 24130251 Free PMC article.
-
Can consultation skills training change doctors' behaviour to increase involvement of patients in making decisions about standard treatment and clinical trials: a randomized controlled trial.Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2570-83. doi: 10.1111/hex.12229. Epub 2014 Jun 30. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 24975503 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving awareness of cancer clinical trials among Hispanic patients and families: audience segmentation decisions for a media intervention.J Health Commun. 2013;18(9):1131-47. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768723. Epub 2013 May 2. J Health Commun. 2013. PMID: 23639101 Free PMC article.
-
The Pros and Comms of Gene Sequencing.Biomed Hub. 2017 Nov 21;2(Suppl 1):32-36. doi: 10.1159/000481299. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec. Biomed Hub. 2017. PMID: 31988929 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical