Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster
- PMID: 12768424
- DOI: 10.1007/s00427-003-0326-8
Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
The insect leg and antenna are thought to be homologous structures, evolved from a common ancestral appendage. The homeotic transformations of antenna to leg in Drosophila produced by mutation of the Hox gene Antennapedia are position-specific, such that every particular antenna structure is transformed into a specific leg counterpart. This has been taken to suggest that the developmental programmes of these two appendages are still similar. In particular, the mechanisms for the specification of a cell's position within the appendage would be identical, only their interpretation would be different and subject to homeotic gene control. Here we explore the degree of conservation between the developmental programmes of leg and antenna in Drosophila and other dipterans, in wild-type and homeotic conditions. Most of the appendage pattern-forming genes are active in both appendages, and their expression domains are partially conserved. However, the regulatory relationships and interactions between these genes are different, and in fact cells change their expression while undergoing homeotic transformation. Thus, the positional information, and the mechanisms which generate it, are not strictly conserved between leg and antenna; and homeotic genes alter the establishment of positional clues, not only their interpretation. The partial conservation of pattern-forming genes in both appendages ensures a predictable re-specification of positional clues, producing the observed positional specificity of homeotic transformations.
Similar articles
-
Spatial and temporal regulation of the homeotic selector gene Antennapedia is required for the establishment of leg identity in Drosophila.Dev Biol. 2004 Mar 15;267(2):462-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.12.006. Dev Biol. 2004. PMID: 15013806
-
Drosophila fushi tarazu. a gene on the border of homeotic function.Curr Biol. 2001 Sep 18;11(18):1403-12. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00443-2. Curr Biol. 2001. PMID: 11566098
-
Developmental biology. Pulling the fly's leg.Nature. 1998 Apr 16;392(6677):657-8. doi: 10.1038/33547. Nature. 1998. PMID: 9565026 No abstract available.
-
Insect evolution: Redesigning the fruitfly.Curr Biol. 1999 Feb 11;9(3):R86-9. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80056-6. Curr Biol. 1999. PMID: 10021382 Review.
-
Cis-regulation in the Drosophila Bithorax Complex.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;689:17-40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6673-5_2. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010. PMID: 20795320 Review.
Cited by
-
Drosophila distal-less and Rotund bind a single enhancer ensuring reliable and robust bric-a-brac2 expression in distinct limb morphogenetic fields.PLoS Genet. 2013 Jun;9(6):e1003581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003581. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PLoS Genet. 2013. PMID: 23825964 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of patterning of serially homologous appendages in insects.Dev Genes Evol. 2004 Jul;214(7):324-38. doi: 10.1007/s00427-004-0412-6. Epub 2004 May 29. Dev Genes Evol. 2004. PMID: 15170569
-
Dynamic genome wide expression profiling of Drosophila head development reveals a novel role of Hunchback in retinal glia cell development and blood-brain barrier integrity.PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 23;14(1):e1007180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007180. eCollection 2018 Jan. PLoS Genet. 2018. PMID: 29360820 Free PMC article.
-
Expression patterns of leg genes in the mouthparts of the spider Cupiennius salei (Chelicerata: Arachnida).Dev Genes Evol. 2004 Jun;214(6):296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00427-004-0393-5. Epub 2004 Mar 11. Dev Genes Evol. 2004. PMID: 15014991
-
Control of Distal-less expression in the Drosophila appendages by functional 3' enhancers.Dev Biol. 2011 May 15;353(2):396-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Dev Biol. 2011. PMID: 21320482 Free PMC article.