Evidence-based medicine and quality of care
- PMID: 12769413
- DOI: 10.1023/A:1022995623172
Evidence-based medicine and quality of care
Abstract
In this paper we set out to examine the arguments for and against the claim that Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) will improve the quality of care. In particular, we examine the following issues: 1. Are there hidden ethical assumptions in the methodology of EBM? 2. Is there a tension between the duty of care and EBM? 3. How can patient preferences be incorporated into quality guidelines and effectiveness studies? 4. Is there a tension between the quality of a particular intervention and overall quality of care? 5. Are certain branches of medicine and patient groups innately or prima facie disadvantaged by a shift to EBM? In addition we consider a case study in the ethics of EBM, on a clinical trial concerning the collection of umbilical cord blood in utero and ex utero, during or after labour in childbirth.
Comment in
-
The role of evidence in health policy making: a normative perspective.Health Care Anal. 2002;10(3):309-17. doi: 10.1023/A:1022955909060. Health Care Anal. 2002. PMID: 12769418
-
Legalising science.Health Care Anal. 2002;10(3):329-37. doi: 10.1023/A:1022960109968. Health Care Anal. 2002. PMID: 12769420
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
