Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jun 10;100(12):7383-8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1132171100. Epub 2003 May 27.

Apparent homology of expressed genes from wood-forming tissues of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with Arabidopsis thaliana

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Apparent homology of expressed genes from wood-forming tissues of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with Arabidopsis thaliana

Matias Kirst et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) and Arabidopsis thaliana differ greatly in form, ecological niche, evolutionary history, and genome size. Arabidopsis is a small, herbaceous, annual dicotyledon, whereas pines are large, long-lived, coniferous forest trees. Such diverse plants might be expected to differ in a large number of functional genes. We have obtained and analyzed 59,797 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from wood-forming tissues of loblolly pine and compared them to the gene sequences inferred from the complete sequence of the Arabidopsis genome. Approximately 50% of pine ESTs have no apparent homologs in Arabidopsis or any other angiosperm in public databases. When evaluated by using contigs containing long, high-quality sequences, we find a higher level of apparent homology between the inferred genes of these two species. For those contigs 1,100 bp or longer, approximately 90% have an apparent Arabidopsis homolog (E value < 10-10). Pines and Arabidopsis last shared a common ancestor approximately 300 million years ago. Few genes would be expected to retain high sequence similarity for this time if they did not have essential functions. These observations suggest substantial conservation of gene sequence in seed plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Loblolly pine xylogenesis UniGene set, classified by cellular functional categories, compared with A. thaliana. The proportion of Arabidopsis genes in each functional category is relative to the 12,922 total predicted genes that were assigned by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (7) to 1 of 12 major categories. The proportion of predicted loblolly pine genes in each functional category is relative to the total number of contigs and singlets (xylogenesis UniGene set) for which homology was found to an Arabidopsis gene (blastx E value < 10-5) that was assigned to at least one functional category.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Proportion of P. taeda (loblolly pine) contigs with no homology to A. thaliana predicted gene sequences (y axis) relative to the contig length category (x axis). Four blastx E-value thresholds (>10-30, >10-20, >10-10, and >10-5) were used to indicate no homology (z axis).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Relationship of length of ORF-containing contigs and length of ORF-containing singlets to percentage of apparent Arabidopsis homologs.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Sequence similarity (blastx score on y axis) of contig 6,593 at increasing lengths (from 5′ to 3′) compared with the Arabidopsis probable homolog. The left and right arrows indicate the beginning and end of the Arabidopsis gene coding sequence, respectively.

References

    1. Edwards, D., Davies, K. L. & Axe, L. (1992) Nature 357, 683-685.
    1. Bowe, L. M., Coat, G. & de Pamphilis, C. W. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4092-4097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuzoff, R. K. & Gasser, C. S. (2002) Trends Plant Sci. 5, 330-336. - PubMed
    1. Chaw, S.-M., Parkinson, C. L., Cheng, Y., Vincent, T. M. & Palmer, J. D. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4086-4091. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leitch, I. J., Hanson, L., Winfield, M., Parker, J. & Bennett, M. D. (2001) Ann. Bot. (London) 88, 843-849.

Publication types