Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section
- PMID: 12771457
- DOI: 10.1159/000070182
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the results of a modified laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) procedure, using light-endorsed transvaginal section by two puncture trocars, with those of total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a prospective, randomized, short-term study. A new, modified LAVH technique using Endo GIA stapler and two puncture trocars was established. For the laparoscopic phase, each adnexum was dissected, and the vesicouterine junction was identified clearly with the laparoscopic light from the vaginal side. Vaginal-phase surgery was performed as usual. Two hundred patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to either LAVH (n = 100) or TAH (n = 100). Duration of hospitalization, time of surgery, dose of analgesics, and rates of complications were significantly lower in the LAVH group (p < 0.001). The average operating time was 77 +/- 30 min for LAVH and 102 +/- 18 min for TAH. The duration of hospitalization was 3.2 +/- 0.7 days for LAVH and 5.5 +/- 1.3 days for TAH. There were three complications in the LAVH group and 15 in the TAH group. Postoperative meperidine requirements (1.2 vs. 3.7 ampoules, 1 ampoule = 50 mg) were significantly fewer in the LAVH group. Regarding the training time, the mean operating time in the first 20 cases was 98 min, and in the last 20 cases it was 70.9 min. As compared with TAH and other modified LAVH procedures reported previously, the present technique is easy to learn and timesaving with fewer complications.
Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011. PMID: 22776300
-
Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):620-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13303.x. BJOG. 2000. PMID: 10826576 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007. PMID: 17596034
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.J Reprod Med. 1994 Aug;39(8):625-30. J Reprod Med. 1994. PMID: 7996527 Review.
-
Laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a cost comparison.Med J Aust. 1997 Feb 17;166(4):205-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb140078.x. Med J Aust. 1997. PMID: 9066551 Review.
Cited by
-
Converting potential abdominal hysterectomy to vaginal one: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:305614. doi: 10.1155/2014/305614. Epub 2014 Mar 5. Minim Invasive Surg. 2014. PMID: 24729873 Free PMC article.
-
Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1827913. doi: 10.1155/2017/1827913. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28373977 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. PMID: 26264829 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37642285 Free PMC article.
-
Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15976422 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
