Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May 19;88(10):1549-52.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600931.

Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer

O A Khan et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

The factors affecting long-term survival following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer are poorly understood. We examined the significance of microscopic tumour involvement at the circumferential resection margin (CRM) on postoperative survival following oesophagectomy. The case notes of 329 patients who underwent a potentially curative oesophagectomy for squamous or adenocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. As part of the procedure, all patients underwent an en-bloc resection of their periesophageal tissue. The presence of tumour either at, or within, 1 mm of the CRM was recorded and correlated with their TNM and survival data. A total of 67 patients (20%) were noted to have a positive CRM, of which 40 cases (12%) had tumour at the resection margin and the remainder had tumour within 1 mm of the margin. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant association between survival and either category of CRM involvement. Multivariate analysis showed that only T-stage, nodal status and tumour grade were prognostic markers. In conclusion, the presence of microscopic tumour at the CRM following an en-bloc oesophagectomy is not a significant prognostic marker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival curves for patients with (lower line) and without (upper line) CRM involvement.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. Lancet 344: 707–711 - PubMed
    1. Alexiou C, Beggs D, Salama F, Brackenbury ET, Morgan WE (1998) Surgery for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: the view from Nottingham. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116(4): 545–553 - PubMed
    1. Altorki NK, Giraldi L, Skinner DB (1997) En bloc esophagectomy improves survival for stage III oesophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114(6): 948–956 - PubMed
    1. Dexter SPL, Sue-Ling S, McMahon MJ, Quirke P, Mapstone N, Martin IG (2001) Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut 48: 667–670 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards JM, Hillier VF, Lawson RAM, Moussalli H, Hasleton PS (1989) Squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus: histological criteria and their prognostic significance. Br J Cancer 59: 429–433 - PMC - PubMed