Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis
- PMID: 12772007
- DOI: 10.1155/2003/250815
Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis
Abstract
Several approaches have been used in an attempt to predict the severity and prognosis of attacks of acute pancreatitis. The Ranson and Glasgow criteria include a variety of simple laboratory parameters that are measured on admission and again within 48 h. They are the most widely used indices in clinical practice. The Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II system is more complicated, but can be applied to a wide variety of conditions, especially in intensive care settings. The usefulness of this system depends on the threshold score for defining severe pancreatitis; a score of eight appears to be the most appropriate. The finding of nonperfused areas in the pancreas at contrast-enhanced computed tomography is indicative of pancreatic necrosis and portends an unfavourable prognosis. Other clinical and laboratory indices have been proposed, but the most important predictive factor of early mortality seems to be the presence and persistence of a Marshall organ failure score of two or more. This is especially true if organ dysfunction persists beyond 36 h. Radiological findings do not always correlate well with the presence of organ dysfunction, and more investigations are required.
Similar articles
-
Improved prediction of outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE II score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the APACHE II score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation.Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1136-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1136. Arch Surg. 2002. PMID: 12361419
-
Acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit patients: value of clinical and radiologic prognosticators at predicting clinical course and outcome.Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049951.77583.85. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 12682467
-
Serum interleukin-15 level is a useful predictor of the complications and mortality in severe acute pancreatitis.Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.002. Surgery. 2007. PMID: 17723882 Clinical Trial.
-
Imaging and clinical prognostic indicators of acute pancreatitis: a comparative insight.Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2010 Sep;40(3):283-7. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2010. PMID: 21049773 Review.
-
Severity scoring for acute pancreatitis: where do we stand in 1999?Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 1999 Apr;1(2):134-8. doi: 10.1007/s11894-996-0012-x. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 1999. PMID: 10980940 Review.
Cited by
-
Pancreatitis: A Forensic Perspective.Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016 Jun;6(2):237-248. doi: 10.23907/2016.025. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016. PMID: 31239895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigating the prognostic power of Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score.Caspian J Intern Med. 2025 Mar 21;16(2):297-304. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.2.297. eCollection 2025 Spring. Caspian J Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 40575756 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of abdominal fat distribution on severity of acute pancreatitis.Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Sep;7(3):264-269. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.109345. Epub 2021 Oct 11. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34712827 Free PMC article.
-
The causes and outcome of acute pancreatitis associated with serum lipase >10,000 u/l.Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Nov;56(11):3376-81. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1752-5. Epub 2011 May 26. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21614591
-
Relationship between the degree of severe acute pancreatitis and patient immunity.Surg Today. 2015 Aug;45(8):1009-17. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1083-1. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 25410475
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical