Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 May;90(5 Suppl 2):47-51.
doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61649-3.

Use of pulmonary function tests in the diagnosis of occupational asthma

Affiliations
Review

Use of pulmonary function tests in the diagnosis of occupational asthma

Wasif Anees. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003 May.

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the different methods of assessing lung function measurements for the diagnosis of occupational asthma, focusing in particular on serial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) monitoring, including details on how PEFR records should be kept, plotted, and analyzed and limitations of the method.

Data sources: Published studies on the use of diagnostic methods in occupational asthma, expert opinion, and recently obtained data from studies performed at a large occupational lung disease clinic. STUDY SOURCES: The expert opinion of the author was used to select the relevant data for review.

Results: Objective methods are necessary for the diagnosis of occupational asthma, since clinical history alone is not a satisfactory means of diagnosis. Serial PEFR monitoring has a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for occupational asthma and is more useful than evaluation of cross-shift change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second or change in nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Interpretation is best performed by expert visual evaluation of plots of maximum, mean, and minimum daily PEFR readings.

Conclusions: Despite some limitations of the method, serial PEFR monitoring is usually the most appropriate first-line investigation in workers suspected of having occupational asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by