Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics
- PMID: 12774655
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4
Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics
Abstract
Scientific societies can have a powerful influence on the professional lives of scientists. Using this influence, they have a responsibility to make long-term commitments and investments in promoting integrity in publication, just as in other areas of research ethics. Concepts that can inform the thinking and activities of scientific societies with regard to publication ethics are: the "hidden curriculum" (the message of actions rather than formal statements), a fresh look at the components of acting with integrity, deviancy as a normally occurring phenomenon in human society, and the scientific community as an actual community. A society's first step is to decide what values it will promote, within the framework of present-day standards of good conduct of science and given the society's history and traditions. The society then must create educational programs that serve members across their careers. Scientific societies must take seriously the implications of the problem; set policies and standards for publication ethics for their members; educate about and enforce the standards; bring the issues before the members early and often; and maintain continuing dialogue with editors.
Similar articles
-
Promoting research integrity at the American Society for Microbiology.Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0009-x. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003. PMID: 12774654
-
Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity.Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):257-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0012-2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003. PMID: 12774657
-
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct. Commentary on 'Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity' (Levine and Iutcovitch).Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):269-72. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0013-1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003. PMID: 12774658
-
Normal and normative ethics in behavioral sciences.Am Psychol. 1984 Aug;39(8):863-76. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.39.8.863. Am Psychol. 1984. PMID: 11644156 Review. No abstract available.
-
The role of the AADR in promoting research integrity: perspectives and consensus statements.J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):856-60. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750022001. J Dent Res. 1996. PMID: 8655787 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Impact and Assessment of Research Integrity Teaching: A Systematic Literature Review.Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jul 23;30(4):30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00493-1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39042336 Free PMC article.
-
Publication ethics in biomedical journals from countries in Central and Eastern Europe.Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Mar;20(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9431-x. Epub 2013 Mar 1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014. PMID: 23456142 Free PMC article.