Co-bedding versus single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators
- PMID: 12774876
- DOI: 10.1177/0884217503253434
Co-bedding versus single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators
Abstract
Objective: To compare the physiological stability and behavioral effects of co-bedding with those of single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators as well as the psychological effects on their parents.
Design: Prospective, randomized, repeated measure.
Participants: Convenience sample of 16 infants and 8 parents in the co-bedded group, and 21 infants and 11 parents in the control group.
Interventions: Infants in the study group were co-bedded in incubators.
Main outcome measures: Baseline and posttesting for parental state anxiety, maternal attachment, and parental satisfaction measures; infant sleep-wake synchronicity; physiological measures; and stress cue measures during baseline and activity.
Main results: Repeated measures 5 (time) x 2 (group) analysis of variance found significant differences in infant daily weight, feeding amount, and high-activity heart rate. There was no difference in parental state anxiety, maternal attachment, and parental satisfaction scores by group, except for higher baseline parental satisfaction scores in the co-bedded group.
Conclusions: This research demonstrated the safety of co-bedding multiple-gestation infants in incubators but did not find any significant clinical improvement in infant or parental outcomes with co-bedding. Neonatal intensive-care unit providers should educate staff and parents about the potential benefits of co-bedding and consider developing policies and procedures for co-bedding in both incubators and cribs. Co-bedding of multiple-gestation infants may be provided as an adjunctive developmental care strategy if parents desire this intervention.
Similar articles
-
Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial).BMC Pediatr. 2009 Dec 11;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-76. BMC Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 20003351 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Co-bedding versus traditional bedding of multiple-gestation infants in the NICU.J Healthc Qual. 2003 Jan-Feb;25(1):5-10; quiz 10-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2003.tb01025.x. J Healthc Qual. 2003. PMID: 12879624
-
Co-bedding of twins in the neonatal intensive care unit.Pediatr Nurs. 1998 Nov-Dec;24(6):529-31. Pediatr Nurs. 1998. PMID: 10085994
-
[Implementation of an individualized program of sustained development in neonatal intensive care: why, how?].Arch Pediatr. 1999 Apr;6(4):434-9. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(99)80227-9. Arch Pediatr. 1999. PMID: 10230485 Review. French.
-
Salivary Cortisol Reactivity in Preterm Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care: An Integrative Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Mar 18;13(3):337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030337. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26999185 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Co-bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 14;4(4):CD008313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008313.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27075527 Free PMC article.
-
Co-bedding as a Comfort measure For Twins undergoing painful procedures (CComForT Trial).BMC Pediatr. 2009 Dec 11;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-76. BMC Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 20003351 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical