A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties--'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics'?
- PMID: 12775086
- DOI: 10.1002/dys.245
A critique of claims from Reynolds, Nicolson & Hambly (2003) that DDAT is an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties--'lies, damned lies and (inappropriate) statistics'?
Abstract
Reynolds, Nicolson and Hambly (Dyslexia 2003; 9: 48) report a study to evaluate the effectiveness of dyslexia dyspraxia attention deficit treatment (DDAT)-an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties. They claim that DDAT is an effective treatment with positive effects on the cognitive skills underlying literacy and the reading process. We outline the numerous methodological and statistical problems with this study and conclude that it provides no evidence that DDAT is an effective form of treatment for children with reading difficulties.
Comment on
-
Evaluation of an exercise-based treatment for children with reading difficulties.Dyslexia. 2003 Feb;9(1):48-71; discussion 46-7. doi: 10.1002/dys.235. Dyslexia. 2003. PMID: 12625376
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
