Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1175-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1175.

Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation

Robert Paul Riemsma  1 , Jill Pattenden, Christopher Bridle, Amanda J Sowden, Lisa Mather, Ian S Watt, Anne Walker
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation

Robert Paul Riemsma et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions using a stage based approach in bringing about positive changes in smoking behaviour.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: 35 electronic databases, catalogues, and internet resources (from inception to July 2002). Bibliographies of retrieved references were scanned for other relevant publications, and authors were contacted if necessary.

Results: 23 randomised controlled trials were reviewed; two reported details of an economic evaluation. Eight trials reported effects in favour of stage based interventions, three trials showed mixed results, and 12 trials found no statistically significant differences between a stage based intervention and a non-stage based intervention or no intervention. Eleven trials compared a stage based intervention with a non-stage based intervention, and one reported statistically significant effects in favour of the stage based intervention. Two studies reported mixed effects, and eight trials reported no statistically significant differences between groups. The methodological quality of the trials was mixed, and few reported any validation of the instrument used to assess participants' stage of change. Overall, the evidence suggests that stage based interventions are no more effective than non-stage based interventions or no intervention in changing smoking behaviour.

Conclusions: Limited evidence exists for the effectiveness of stage based interventions in changing smoking behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Smoking cessation: what the health service can do. Effectiveness Matters 1998;3: 1-4.
    1. Woolacott N, Jones L, Forbes C, Mather L, Sowden A, Song F, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2002;6(16): 1-245. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion for smoking cessation. London: NICE, 2002. (Technology Appraisal Guidance No 39.)
    1. Office for National Statistics. Living in Britain: results from the 1998 general household survey. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
    1. Brown R, Larkin J, Davis R. Current concepts in the management of smoking cessation: a review. Am J Manag Care 2000;6: 394-404. - PubMed

Publication types