A guide to device selection: cardiac resynchronization therapy alone or in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
- PMID: 12776013
A guide to device selection: cardiac resynchronization therapy alone or in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Abstract
The most recent estimates show an apparent increase in sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the United States. A major reduction in SCD will depend on developing effective methods to identify and prevent risk factors for SCD. This article reviews the research milestones that have resulted in our current approach to risk stratification and treatment of patients at high risk for SCD. One of the earliest attempts to prevent SCD involved suppression of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in high-risk patients, but trials using a variety of antiarrhythmic drugs with the aim of suppressing PVCs and reducing mortality demonstrated negative survival results. In the case of amiodarone, clinical trial data to date suggest that it should not be used for primary prevention of SCD or to prolong survival in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been demonstrated in multiple studies to be the most significant therapy for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and for primary and secondary prevention of SCD. It is recommended that the majority of patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy should have an ICD unit implanted in order to include defibrillator therapy.
Similar articles
-
Primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death: the role of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2001 Fall;2(4):197-205. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2001. PMID: 12439369 Review.
-
The Midlands Trial of Empirical Amiodarone versus Electrophysiology-guided Interventions and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (MAVERIC): a multi-centre prospective randomised clinical trial on the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.Europace. 2004 Jul;6(4):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.009. Europace. 2004. PMID: 15172648 Clinical Trial.
-
[Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) versus antiarrhythmic drugs].Arch Cardiol Mex. 2007 Oct-Dec;77 Suppl 4:S4-129-32. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2007. PMID: 18938711 Spanish.
-
Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476. Eur Heart J. 2000. PMID: 11102258
-
Appropriate evaluation and treatment of heart failure patients after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge: time to go beyond the initial shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 24;54(22):1993-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.039. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19926003 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure in Children.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2004 Oct;6(5):407-416. doi: 10.1007/s11936-004-0024-5. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2004. PMID: 15324616
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical