Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jun;57(7):931-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70037-6.

A comparison of image quality between tissue harmonic imaging and fundamental imaging with an electronic radial scanning echoendoscope in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of image quality between tissue harmonic imaging and fundamental imaging with an electronic radial scanning echoendoscope in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases

Hideki Ishikawa et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The availability of an electronic radial scanning echoendoscope has facilitated the clinical use of tissue harmonic imaging. This study compares the quality of US images acquired by tissue harmonic imaging during electronic radial scanning EUS to those acquired by fundamental imaging.

Methods: Electronic radial scanning EUS was performed in 108 patients with pancreatic lesions (58 cystic, 50 solid). US images acquired by fundamental imaging at a frequency of 7.5 MHz were compared with those acquired by tissue harmonic imaging by using transmitting and receiving frequencies of, respectively, 4.0 and 8.0 MHz at the same scanning plane. Cystic lesions were evaluated for boundary/septum and nodules, and solid lesions, for boundary and internal structure. US images acquired by tissue harmonic imaging and fundamental imaging during electronic radial scanning EUS were compared, by using a Likert scale for the respective evaluation criteria, by two independent endoscopists.

Observations: For cystic lesions, tissue harmonic images were significantly clearer than fundamental images for visualizing boundary and septum (p < 0.0001, both reviewers) and nodules (p = 0.0003, Reviewer 1; p = 0.0007, Reviewer 2). For solid lesions, tissue harmonic images were significantly clearer than fundamental images for visualizing boundary (p = 0.0003, Reviewer 1; p < 0.0001, Reviewer 2) and internal structures (p = 0.0003, Reviewer 1; p = 0.0009, Reviewer 2).

Conclusions: US images acquired by tissue harmonic imaging appear to be clearer compared with those acquired by fundamental imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources