Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Spring;4(2):124-31.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v4i2.2527.

Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51

David S Followill  1 , William F Hanson, Geoffrey S Ibbott, Leon R Eglezopoulos, Chen-Shou Chui
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG-21 protocol: another reason to switch to TG-51

David S Followill et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003 Spring.

Abstract

Two of the most popular dosimetry systems used for calibration of megavoltage photon and electron beams in radiation therapy are (i) cylindrical Farmer-type chambers in liquid water and (ii) Holt Memorial parallel-plate chambers in clear polystyrene. Since implementation of the AAPM TG-21 calibration protocol, the Radiological Physics Center (which uses the Farmer in-water system) has compared machine calibrations on two occasions with those of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (which uses the Holt in-polystyrene system). Two years post publication of the TG-51 protocol, 70% of the clinics monitored by the RPC still use TG-21. Seventeen photon beams from cobalt-60 to 18 MV and 31 electron beams from 6 to 20 MeV were compared using the TG-21 protocol. These data represent the most comprehensive comparison of the two most popular systems in use. Based on the average percent difference, the two systems yielded the same absorbed dose to water at the reference point in phantom to within 1.5% for both modalities. No energy dependence was evident in the results; however, a systematic average percent difference between photons and electrons was seen, with the Farmer in-water system consistently predicting a dose 1.3% lower for electrons than the Holt in-polystyrene system. For photons both systems predicted the same dose to within 0.3% on average. When a physicist converts from TG-21 to TG-51, these data may be of assistance in explaining unexpected changes in output that are different from previously published values. Implementation of the TG-51 protocol should eliminate any of the observed differences in electron beam dosimetry between the two dosimetry systems because the Holt system cannot be used with TG-51.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency histogram of the Radiological Physics Center/Memorial Sloan‐Kettering dose ratios for both photons (light bars) and electrons (dark bars) for the two RPC on‐site dosimetry review visits.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grant W., Cundiff J., Hanson W.F., Gagnon W., and Shalek R., “Calibration instrumentation used by the AAPM radiological physics center,” Med. Phys. 3, 353–354 (1976). - PubMed
    1. Holt J., Buffa A., Perry D., Ma I., and McDonald J., “Absorbed dose measurements using parallel plate polystyrene ionization chambers in polystyrene phantoms,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 5, 2031–2038 (1979). - PubMed
    1. SCRAD: Subcommittee on Radiation Dosimetry, American Association of Physicists in Medicine “Protocol for the dosimetry of x‐ and gamma‐ray beams with maximum energies between 0.6 and 50 MeV,” Phys. Med. Biol. 16, 379–396 (1979). - PubMed
    1. ICRU21: International Commission on Radiation Units , “Radiation dosimetry: electrons with initial energies between 1 and 50 Mev,” ICRU Report No. 21 (1972).
    1. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, RTC Task Group 21 , “A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high‐energy photon and electron beams,” Med. Phys. 10, 741–771 (1983). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources