Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement
- PMID: 12777182
- PMCID: PMC161815
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10
Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate if physical functions usually associated with a younger population were of importance for an older population, and to construct an outcome measure for hip osteoarthritis with improved responsiveness compared to the Western Ontario McMaster osteoarthritis score (WOMAC LK 3.0).
Methods: A 40 item questionnaire (hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score, HOOS) was constructed to assess patient-relevant outcomes in five separate subscales (pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, sport and recreation function and hip related quality of life). The HOOS contains all WOMAC LK 3.0 questions in unchanged form. The HOOS was distributed to 90 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis (mean age 71.5, range 49-85, 41 females) assigned for total hip replacement for osteoarthritis preoperatively and at six months follow-up.
Results: The HOOS met set criteria of validity and responsiveness. It was more responsive than WOMAC regarding the subscales pain (SRM 2.11 vs. 1.83) and other symptoms (SRM 1.83 vs. 1.28). The responsiveness (SRM) for the two added subscales sport and recreation and quality of life were 1.29 and 1.65, respectively. Patients <or= 66 years of age (range 49-66) reported higher responsiveness in all five subscales than patients >66 years of age (range 67-85) (Pain SRM 2.60 vs. 1.97, other symptoms SRM 3.0 vs. 1.60, activity of daily living SRM 2.51 vs. 1.52, sport and recreation function SRM 1.53 vs. 1.21 and hip related quality of life SRM 1.95 vs. 1.57).
Conclusion: The HOOS 2.0 appears to be useful for the evaluation of patient-relevant outcome after THR and is more responsive than the WOMAC LK 3.0. The added subscales sport and recreation function and hip related quality of life were highly responsive for this group of patients, with the responsiveness being highest for those younger than 66.
Figures
Comment in
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181815. Epub 2016 May 11. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27168175 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27228230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RAB. A Statistical Analysis of Hip Scores. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993;75-B:705–709. - PubMed
-
- Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Validation of a Health Status Measure. Medical Care. 1976;14:57–67. - PubMed
-
- Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective Health Status and Medical Consultations. Social Science and Medicine. 1981;15A:221–229. - PubMed
-
- Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Medical Care. 1992;30:473–483. - PubMed
-
- Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95–108. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous