Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 1):e706-13.
doi: 10.1542/peds.111.6.e706.

Long-term safety of fluticasone propionate and nedocromil sodium on bone in children with asthma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term safety of fluticasone propionate and nedocromil sodium on bone in children with asthma

Christian Roux et al. Pediatrics. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for pediatric asthma. However, few controlled long-term studies have investigated their effect on bone mineral density (BMD) and growth.

Methods: Children who were aged 6 to 14 years and had persistent asthma were randomized to 24 months' treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 micro g/d or nedocromil sodium (NS) 8 mg/d (if uncontrolled, maximum doses of 400 micro g/d and 16 mg/d, respectively). BMD was assessed blind and analyzed at a central facility on the basis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of the lumbar spine and femoral neck at months 0, 6, 12, and 24. Height was measured at months 0, 12, and 24. Efficacy parameters (lung function, asthma control, occurrence of exacerbations) were measured every 3 months.

Results: In total, 174 children were randomized to treatment (87 received FP, and 87 received NS). At month 24, the adjusted mean percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD was 11.6% in the FP group compared with 10.4% in NS-treated children (95% confidence interval for treatment difference: -0.7% to 3.1%). The corresponding increases in femoral neck BMD were 8.9% and 8.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in growth between the 2 groups: adjusted mean growth rates were 6.1 cm/y with FP and 5.8 cm/y with NS. FP was significantly superior for every efficacy parameter investigated and was similarly well tolerated as NS.

Conclusions: The long-term effects of FP and NS on BMD accrual and growth are similar among children with asthma. The benefit:risk ratio of FP may be considered superior to that of NS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms