In focus. Has patient autonomy gone to far? Geneticists' views in 36 nations
- PMID: 12778941
In focus. Has patient autonomy gone to far? Geneticists' views in 36 nations
Abstract
We surveyed genetics professionals, patients, and the public about rights to information, to requested services, and to parenthood, posing difficult cases found in practice. In all, 2906 genetics professionals (63%), 499 primary care physicians (59%), 476 North American genetics patients (67%), 394 French patients (51%), 593 German patients (65%), and 988 members of the American public (99%) returned anonymous questionnaires. Results suggest a trend toward increased respect for patient autonomy since an earlier survey in 1985; in most nations more would perform prenatal diagnosis for a couple with 4 daughters who desire a son. A minority (35% in U.S., 14% elsewhere) would perform PND for a deaf couple who want a deaf child, but most (94% in U.S., 62% elsewhere) would do prenatal paternity testing in the absence of rape or incest. About half (51%) would support a woman with fragile X who wants children. The trend to respect patient autonomy was greatest in the U.S. and was least evident in China and India. In general, responses to these cases illustrate a shift away from population or eugenic concerns to a model of genetics focused on the individual.
Similar articles
-
Patient and professional views on autonomy: a survey in the United States and Canada.Health Law Rev. 1998-1999;7(3):9-10. Health Law Rev. 1998. PMID: 15706716 No abstract available.
-
International opinion survey for bioethics and medical genetics.Coll Antropol. 1993 Dec;17(2):191-8. Coll Antropol. 1993. PMID: 11660704 No abstract available.
-
Provider biases and choices: the role of gender.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;36(3):521-31. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199309000-00010. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8403603 Review.
-
Ethics and the commercial use of genetics.Bull Med Ethics. 1995 Sep;No. 111:19-22. Bull Med Ethics. 1995. PMID: 11654272 No abstract available.
-
Ethical aspects of prenatal diagnosis: views of U.S. medical geneticists.Clin Perinatol. 1987 Jun;14(2):293-312. Clin Perinatol. 1987. PMID: 3297466 Review.
Cited by
-
What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(1):41-53. doi: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000021844.57115.9d. Med Health Care Philos. 2004. PMID: 15139254
-
Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 May;31(5):548-554. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01239-y. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 36755103 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing: indications and controversies.Clin Lab Med. 2010 Sep;30(3):519-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Jun 12. Clin Lab Med. 2010. PMID: 20638568 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical