Review
doi: 10.1172/JCI18842.
CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs
Affiliations
- PMID: 12782661
- PMCID: PMC156117
- DOI: 10.1172/JCI18842
Item in Clipboard
Review
CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs
J Clin Invest.
2003 Jun.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
[Is lung cancer screening using CT a good idea?].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(50):A3960. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011. PMID: 22186365 Dutch.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer using faecal blood testing: varying the positive cut-off value.Pathology. 2005 Dec;37(6):565-8. doi: 10.1080/00313020500368279. Pathology. 2005. PMID: 16373240 No abstract available.
-
[Screening for lung cancer using low dosage computer tomography].Duodecim. 2004;120(6):647-8. Duodecim. 2004. PMID: 15119225 Finnish. No abstract available.
-
Randomized clinical trials for cancer screening: rationale and design considerations for imaging tests.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 10;24(20):3252-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5573. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16829649 Review.
-
Screening for lung cancer--a review.Med Sci Monit. 2004 Feb;10(2):RA21-30. Med Sci Monit. 2004. PMID: 14737058 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of CT for screening: a national survey of radiologists' activities and attitudes.Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):160-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071369. Epub 2008 May 15. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18483231 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging and biological function in health and disease.J Clin Invest. 2003 May;111(10):1440-3. doi: 10.1172/JCI18702. J Clin Invest. 2003. PMID: 12750390 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Cancer imaging: is it cost-effective?Cancer Imaging. 2004 Apr 6;4(2):97-103. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0017. Cancer Imaging. 2004. PMID: 18250016 Free PMC article.
-
From accuracy to patient outcome and cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests and biomarkers: an exemplary modelling study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jan 31;13:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-12. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23368927 Free PMC article.
-
How should preoperative examinations be chosen for infants with a ventricular septal defect: transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac CTA, or a combination of these two technologies?BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03635-8. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023. PMID: 38066421 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Casarella WJ. A patient’s viewpoint on a current controversy. Radiology. 2002;224:927. - PubMed
-
- Vliegenthart R, et al. Coronary calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography and myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Eur. Heart J. 2002;23:1596–1603. - PubMed
-
- O’Malley PG, Taylor AJ, Jackson JL, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Prognostic value of coronary electron-beam computed tomography for coronary heart disease events in asymptomatic populations. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000;85:945–948. - PubMed
-
- Hopper KD, Strollo DC, Mauger DT. Comparison of electron-beam and ungated helical CT in detecting coronary arterial calcification by using a working heart phantom and artificial coronary arteries. Radiology. 2002;222:474–482. - PubMed
-
- Kopp AF, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2002;225:113–119. - PubMed
