Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jun;56(6):433-8.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.6.433.

Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens

Affiliations

Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens

B Molnar et al. J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate a recently developed digital slide and virtual microscope system, and to compare this method with optical microscopy on routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens in both local and remote access modes.

Methods: A fully computer controlled commercial microscope was used. The scanning program included object detection, autofocus, and image compression algorithms. The overall hard disk space for a gastric biopsy was between 30 and 50 MB and the scanning time was between 20 and 40 minutes. Haematoxylin and eosin stained routine gastric (61) and colon (42) biopsy specimens were selected, scanned, and evaluated by two specialists on an optical (OM) and virtual microscope (VM).

Results: The overall concordance of VM and OM with the consensus diagnosis was 95.1% and 97%, respectively. Clinically important concordance was 96.1% and 98% for VM and OM, respectively. The two methods showed concordance in 92% of cases and clinically important concordance in 94.1% of cases. The reasons for discordance were image quality (one case), interpretation difference (three cases), and insufficient clinical information (three cases). Remote evaluation of the digital slides through the Internet has the advantages of the previously used static and dynamic telepathology methods.

Conclusions: Diagnostic concordance was found between OM and VM. The digital slide and the virtual microscope can be alternative techniques in the computerisation of the histology laboratory and in teleconsultation services after further evaluation of time and storage constraints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The user interface of the virtual microscope program. The artificial magnification (×10) of a scanned gastric biopsy section is shown on the screen. Note the moving arrows in the left bottom corner and the + and – labels in the middle. These can be used for discrete step magnification and the reduction of a specified area of the slide. On the right bottom of the screen the scanned area of the slide is highlighted.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An intermediate magnification of a scanned gastric biopsy specimen (original magnification, ×200).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The real world scanning magnification (original magnification, ×400) on the virtual microscope. The borders between the mosaicked microscopic field of views can also be detected.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shotton DM. Robert Feulgen prize lecture 1995. Electronic light microscopy: present capabilities and future prospects. Histochem Cell Biol 1995;104:97–137. - PubMed
    1. Dooley RL, Engel C, Muller ME. Automated scanning and digitizing of roentgenographs for documentation and research. Clin Orthop 1997;274:113–19. - PubMed
    1. Mango LJ, Ivasauskas EZ. Computer assisted cervical cytology using the PAPNET testing. In: Wied GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, et al, eds. Compendium on quality assurance, proficiency testing and workload limitations on clinical cytology. Chicago, USA: Tutorials of Cytology, 1995:155–67.
    1. Hailey DM, Lea R. Prospects for newer technologies in cervical cancer screening programmes. J Qual Clin Pract 1995;15:139–45. - PubMed
    1. Baker RW, Wadsworth J, Brugal G, et al. An evaluation of “rapid review” as a method of quality control of cervical smears using the AxioHOME microscope. Cytopathology 1998;8:85–95. - PubMed

Publication types