Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr;2(1):16-23.

Community participation in primary health care (PHC) programmes: lessons from tuberculosis treatment delivery in South Africa

Affiliations

Community participation in primary health care (PHC) programmes: lessons from tuberculosis treatment delivery in South Africa

Samson Kironde et al. Afr Health Sci. 2002 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is renewed interest in the role community participation can play in Primary Health Care (PHC) programmes such as the delivery of effective anti-TB treatment to patients in high-burden settings.

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of community participation in a high-burden Tuberculosis Control Programme and to establish how supervision of treatment by lay volunteers compares with other methods of tuberculosis treatment delivery in the Northern Cape province of South Africa.

Methods: Prospective study involving 769 patients with confirmed pulmonary TB who were followed-up over a one-year period. Questionnaire interviews were also carried out with 135 lay volunteers participating in the TB programme.

Results: One-third of the TB patients in the study received their treatment from lay volunteers in the community. Treatment outcomes for new patients supervised from the community were found to be equivalent to those who received treatment through other modes of treatment delivery (RR=1.04[0.94-1.16], p=0.435). For the re-treatment patients, community-based treatment was found to be superior (RR=5.89[2.30-15.09], p<0.001), to self-administered therapy.

Conclusions: Health care planners should consider community participation as a viable way of ensuring accessibility and effectiveness in PHC programmes. There is need for more research into ways of achieving sustainability in resource-limited but high disease burden settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Occupation status of DOT supporters and TB patients
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Muller F. Participation in Primary Health Care Programmes in Latin America. Medillin: Colombia: University of Antioquia, National School of Public Health; 1980.
    1. Oakley P. Community Involvement in Health Development: An examination of the critical issues. Geneva: WHO; 1989.
    1. MacDonald J. Primary Health Care. London: Earthscan Publications; 1993.
    1. Rifkin S. Community participation in MCH/FP programmes: An analysis based on case study materials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.
    1. Rifkin S. Paradigms lost: towards a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Tropica. 1996;61:79–92. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources