Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan;21(5):475-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-002-0548-7. Epub 2002 Dec 4.

Improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): assessment of macerating enzymes and sonication

Affiliations

Improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): assessment of macerating enzymes and sonication

S Weber et al. Plant Cell Rep. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of shoot apices of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) was evaluated following wounding by cell-wall-digesting enzymes and sonication. The frequency of explants with regenerated shoots expressing GUS (beta-glucuronidase) or GFP (green fluorescent protein) increased following treatment with the macerating enzymes cellulase Onozuka R-10 and pectinase Boerozym M5, whereas treatment with macerozyme R-10 had a negative effect. When a combination of cellulase (0.1%) and pectinase (0.05%) was used, the rate of explants with uniformly GUS-positive shoots increased at least twofold. The transient expression of reporter genes was also enhanced using sonication (50 MHz; 2, 4 and 6 s), but stable expression in regenerated shoots following 4 weeks of selection did not increase with this treatment. Enzyme treatment alone (0.1% cellulase and 0.05% pectinase) was superior to a combined treatment of sonication and enzymes with respect to stable transformation. Polymerase chain reaction analyses of shoots recovered by grafting from transformation experiments using GFP as the reporter gene demonstrated the stable integration of the transgene. Regenerated plants were fertile and seeds could be harvested.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Cell Rep. 1995 Feb;14(5):285-9 - PubMed
    1. Plant Cell Rep. 1991 Jul;10(4):161-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;179(7):2452-8 - PubMed
    1. Plant Cell Rep. 1994 Dec;14(2-3):81-6 - PubMed
    1. Plant J. 1997 Mar;11(3):613-21 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources