Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications
- PMID: 12790846
- DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00162.x
Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications
Erratum in
- Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Oct;82(10):976
Abstract
Background: To identify the risk factors for failed instrumental vaginal delivery, and to compare maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with failed individual and sequential instruments used.
Design: A retrospective case-control study.
Methods: From January 1995 to June 2001, there were 39 508 live births at >37 weeks' gestation of which 2628 (6.7%) instrumental vaginal deliveries were performed, 1723 (4.4%) were vacuum extractions and 905 (2.3%) were forceps. A total of 155/2628 (5.9%) patients who had failed instrumental delivery were matched with 204 patients who had successful instrumental delivery. The patients were divided into five groups. Group I (n = 129) had failed vacuum extraction, group II (n = 13) failed forceps, group III (n = 13) failed both (i.e. failed attempt at both instruments sequentially), group IV (n = 138) had successful vacuum extraction and group V (n = 66) successful forceps.
Results: The failure rate for vacuum extractions 129/1723 (7.5%) was significantly higher than that for forceps 13/905 (1.4%) [odds ratio (OR) = 5.6, 95% CI 3-10.3]. There were no significant differences in all maternal complications (25.5% vs. 26.6%) between vacuum (groups I and IV) and forceps (groups II and V) assisted deliveries. There were more maternal complications in group III (46.2%) than in groups I (35.7%), II (23.1%) and V (27.3%) that did not reach statistical significance but were significantly higher than in group IV (15.9%, OR = 4.5, 95% CI 1.2-16.9). There was a significantly higher rate of all fetal complications in group III [11/13 (84.6%)] than in groups I [69/129 (53.5%)], II [7/13 (53.8%)], IV [35/138 (25.4%)] and V [22/66 (33.3%)] (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 0.9-19.9).
Conclusions: Applying the instrument at < or =0 fetal station, nulliparous women, history of previous cesarean section and fetal head other than occipitoanterior position were risk factors for failed instrumental delivery. Sequential use of instrumental delivery carries a significantly higher neonatal morbidity than when a single instrument is used.
Similar articles
-
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008. PMID: 19016358
-
[Failed forceps extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal morbidity].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Jun;41(4):333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.001. Epub 2012 Jan 9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22227232 French.
-
Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 May;3(3):100339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100339. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 33631384
-
Failed trial of vacuum or forceps--maternal and fetal outcome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):200-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)80036-1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9024114 Review.
-
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21802193 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the Factors Affecting Cesarean Section Selection in Iranian Women Using Multilevel Count Models with Excess Zeros.Iran J Public Health. 2021 Apr;50(4):816-824. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i4.6008. Iran J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34183932 Free PMC article.
-
Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD005545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005545.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23076915 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes of instrumental vaginal delivery at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.Public Health Chall. 2022 Dec 7;1(4):e41. doi: 10.1002/puh2.41. eCollection 2022 Dec. Public Health Chall. 2022. PMID: 40496686 Free PMC article.
-
Is it Time to Rejuvenate the Forceps?J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Aug;63(4):218-22. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0465-4. Epub 2013 Aug 13. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013. PMID: 24431645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259926. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34784382 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical