Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli
- PMID: 12791430
- DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00451-7
Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli
Abstract
Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are nociceptive-related brain responses to activation of cutaneous nociceptors by laser radiant heat stimuli. We previously showed that LEP amplitude during the P2 period (approximately 400 ms) was increased by rare noxious stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention. It was postulated that this effect reflected a P3a response indexing an involuntary shift of attention. In the present study, LEPs were recorded in a three-stimulus oddball paradigm, commonly used to evoke P3a (or novelty-P3). CO(2) laser-induced noxious stimuli were delivered on one hand (80%, frequent). Two series of rare stronger-intensity deviant stimuli were randomly intermixed: target stimuli (10%) were delivered on the same hand while distractor stimuli (10%) were delivered on the other hand. Subjects were instructed to count targets. During an additional session, strong stimuli were delivered alone on one hand without instruction (100%, no-task stimuli). All stimulus types evoked a first positivity around 360 ms (P360). Targets and distractors elicited a late positive complex (LPC) around 465-500 ms. Topography of LPC to distractors was central and significantly more anterior than that of LPC to targets. Distractor LPC corresponds to P3a (or novelty-P3) indexing an involuntary orientation of attention toward an unexpected new/deviant event. It suggests that at least an early part of the LEP positivity (P360) is independent of P3-activities.
Similar articles
-
Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials.Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):21-39. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00051-9. Pain. 2002. PMID: 12237181
-
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional orientation in humans to strong intensity deviant nociceptive stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 20;339(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01485-4. Neurosci Lett. 2003. PMID: 12614906
-
Involuntary orientation of attention to unattended deviant nociceptive stimuli is modulated by concomitant visual task difficulty. Evidence from laser evoked potentials.Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;116(9):2165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.019. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16055373 Clinical Trial.
-
Involuntary orienting of attention to nociceptive events: neural and behavioral signatures.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2423-34. doi: 10.1152/jn.00372.2009. Epub 2009 Aug 19. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19692512
-
Stimulus novelty, and not neural refractoriness, explains the repetition suppression of laser-evoked potentials.J Neurophysiol. 2010 Oct;104(4):2116-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.01088.2009. Epub 2010 Jun 30. J Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20592123
Cited by
-
The human operculo-insular cortex is pain-preferentially but not pain-exclusively activated by trigeminal and olfactory stimuli.PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034798. Epub 2012 Apr 5. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22496865 Free PMC article.
-
Attention to pain is processed at multiple cortical sites in man.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):513-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1885-2. Epub 2004 May 4. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15127169
-
Experience with opioids does not modify the brain network involved in expectations of placebo analgesia.Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Apr;55(7):1840-1858. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15645. Epub 2022 Mar 22. Eur J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35266226 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple linear regression to estimate time-frequency electrophysiological responses in single trials.Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:442-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.062. Epub 2015 Feb 7. Neuroimage. 2015. PMID: 25665966 Free PMC article.
-
Top-down and bottom-up modulation of pain-induced oscillations.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 2;9:375. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00375. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26190991 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alain C, Richer F, Achim A, Saint Hilaire JM. Human intracerebral potentials associated with target, novel, and omitted auditory stimuli. Brain Topogr. 1989;1:237-245.
-
- Alain C, Woods DL. Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:534-546.
-
- Alho K, Winkler I, Escera C, Huotilainen M, Virtanen J, Jääskeläinen IP, Pekkonen E, Ilmoniemi RJ. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:211-224.
-
- Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 1994;31:469-479.
-
- Arntz A, Hopmans M. Unpredicted pain disrupts more than correctly predicted pain, but does not hurt more. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:1121-1129.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous