Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood
- PMID: 12791854
- PMCID: PMC156516
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2391-2394.2003
Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood
Abstract
Standard aerobic media are widely used for culturing blood with the BacT/ALERT (BioMérieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) (BM) and BACTEC 9240 (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) (BD) automated continuously monitoring instrument systems. Although similarly composed of soybean-casein digest broths, the formulations of the standard aerobic media available for these instruments differ from each other in supplements and in sodium polyanetholesulfonate concentration. Therefore, we compared the standard aerobic media available for these systems at two university hospitals. Blood samples from adult patients with suspected bloodstream infection were inoculated at the bedside into nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instruments. The laboratories received 6,743 pairs of bottles that were each filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 523 isolates representing true infections were recovered from 257 patients; of these isolates, 348 were recovered from both the BD and the BM bottles, 108 were recovered from the BM bottles only, and 67 were recovered from the BD bottles only (P < 0.005). More staphylococci (P < 0.05), especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.05), and yeasts (P < 0.01) were recovered from BM bottles than from BD bottles. Of 291 unimicrobial episodes of bloodstream infection, 220 were detected with both bottles, 41 were detected with the BM bottles only, and 30 were detected with the BD bottles only (difference not significant). Among 335 cultures that were positive in both bottles within the first 72 h of incubation, the median times to detection were 14 h for BM bottles and 13 h for BD bottles. Rates for false-positive results were 0.5% for BM bottles and 0.1% for BD bottles. One BM bottle and seven BD bottles yielded false-negative results. We conclude that the BM medium provides improved recovery of microorganisms, especially staphylococci and yeasts, compared with that provided by the BD medium.
Similar articles
-
Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2098-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11376041 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):983-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.983-989.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11230415 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. J Clin Microbiol. 1992. PMID: 1537900 Free PMC article.
-
Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2275-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2275-2278.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12791835 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jul;10(3):444-65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.10.3.444. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997. PMID: 9227861 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Performance of the Four Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles BacT/ALERT-FN, -FN Plus, BACTEC-Plus and -Lytic in Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria and Identification by Direct MALDI-TOF MS.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142398. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26554930 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):2983-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1650-6. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22669561
-
Detection of bacteria in red blood cell concentrates by the Scansystem method.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May;43(5):2251-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2251-2255.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15872251 Free PMC article.
-
Updated review of blood culture contamination.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Oct;19(4):788-802. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-05. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006. PMID: 17041144 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biographical feature: Melvin P. Weinstein, M.D.J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Aug;51(8):2476-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01354-13. Epub 2013 Jun 5. J Clin Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23740724 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- McNemar, Q. 1969. Psychological statistics. Wiley, New York, N.Y.
-
- Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). 1995. Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
-
- NCCLS. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth Informational Supplement. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
-
- Weinstein, M. P., S. Mirrett, L. G. Reimer, M. L. Wilson, S. Smith-Elekes, C. R. Chuard, K. L. Joho, and L. B. Reller. 1995. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:978-981. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical