Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects
- PMID: 12792012
- PMCID: PMC1743722
- DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.210
Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects
Abstract
Evaluation is an integral component of quality improvement and there is much to be learned from the evaluation of small scale quality improvement initiatives at a local level. This type of evaluation is useful for a number of different reasons including monitoring the impact of local projects, identifying and dealing with issues as they arise within a project, comparing local projects to draw lessons, and collecting more detailed information as part of a bigger evaluation project. Focused audits and developmental studies can be used for evaluation within projects, while methods such as multiple case studies and process evaluations can be used to draw generalised lessons from local experiences and to provide examples of successful projects. Evaluations of small scale quality improvement projects help those involved in improvement initiatives to optimise their choice of interventions and use of resources. Important information to add to the knowledge base of quality improvement in health care can be derived by undertaking formal evaluation of local projects, particularly in relation to building theory around the processes of implementation and increasing understanding of the complex change processes involved.
Similar articles
-
Setting up improvement projects in small scale primary care practices: feasibility of a model for continuous quality improvement.Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.36. Qual Health Care. 1999. PMID: 10557668 Free PMC article.
-
Selecting clinical quality improvement projects: getting a bigger return for your investment.Top Health Inf Manage. 2000 Feb;20(3):27-34. Top Health Inf Manage. 2000. PMID: 10747432
-
Program specification: a precursor to program monitoring and quality improvement. A case study from Boysville of Michigan.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):208-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02287481. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595883
-
Implementing early mobilisation in the intensive care unit: An integrative review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:91-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Oct 2. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018. PMID: 29073462 Review.
-
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917477 Review.
Cited by
-
Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series.Implement Sci. 2008 Apr 22;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-21. Implement Sci. 2008. PMID: 18430200 Free PMC article.
-
The NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy.Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 23;6:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-96. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21861886 Free PMC article.
-
The Participative Design of an Endoscopy Facility using Lean 3P.BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Mar 3;5(1):u208920.w3611. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u208920.w3611. eCollection 2016. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016. PMID: 27493744 Free PMC article.
-
The estimation of patients' views on organizational aspects of a general dental practice by general dental practitioners: a survey study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 11;11:263. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-263. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011. PMID: 21989235 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in drugs: the development of a comprehensive knowledge base to improve gender awareness prescribing.Biol Sex Differ. 2017 Oct 24;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13293-017-0155-5. Biol Sex Differ. 2017. PMID: 29065918 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources