Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction?
- PMID: 12794574
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6650-x
Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction?
Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the extent of anal sphincter muscle injury as graded at endosonography correlates with the degree of functional impairment.
Methods: Three hundred and thirty adults presenting for evaluation of fecal incontinence were recruited. Ultrasound was performed with a 7.5-MHz radial rotating axial endoprobe in the left lateral position. Anal sphincter muscle tears were graded on the basis of the degree of circumferential involvement (< or >25 percent) and by an assessment of the superoinferior longitudinal extent of an external anal sphincter tear. Muscles that demonstrated multiple tears, poor visualization, or fragmentation were classed as fragmented. Sphincter injuries were correlated with basal and squeeze pressures at manometry, pudendal nerve terminal latencies, and the severity of symptoms using the Parks-Browning clinical score.
Results: Patients with an intact external anal sphincter had a higher squeeze pressure (mean, 162.6 cm H(2)O) than those with a partial- (mean, 125.7 cm H(2)O) or full-length tear (mean, 124.9 cm H(2)O; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in squeeze pressure between those with partial- vs. full-length external anal sphincter tears nor between circumference tears < or >25 percent. Basal pressure was significantly lower in those with a full-length external anal sphincter tear (47.8 cm H(2)O) vs. an intact external anal sphincter (65.7 cm H(2)O; P < 0.001). The basal pressure in those with an intact internal anal sphincter was not significantly different from those with clearly defined internal anal sphincter tears, and the degree of circumferential involvement was also not important in this regard. However, those with a fragmented internal anal sphincter had a significantly lower basal pressure than other subgroups of internal anal sphincter injuries (P < 0.001). There was no association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, suggesting the patient groups were neurologically similar. There was no significant association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the severity of reported symptoms.
Conclusion: Correlations between the presence or absence of muscle tears and reduced manometric function have been identified. Further grading of tears was of less importance. No relationship between muscle injuries and the severity of clinical symptoms could be elicited.
Comment in
-
Endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter: the size of the tear does matter.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Apr;47(4):546-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0071-0. Epub 2004 Feb 25. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 14978623 No abstract available.
-
Symptomatic fecal incontinence, sonographic sphincter damage, and normal manometry.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1991-2; author reply 1992. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0668-y. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 15622598 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Delayed pudendal nerve conduction and endosonographic appearance of the anal sphincter complex.Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1689-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02236851. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000. PMID: 11156452
-
Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests.Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Oct;35(10):944-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02253496. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992. PMID: 1395981
-
Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of external anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence: correlation with symptoms and manometry.Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;13(4):449-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02208.x. Colorectal Dis. 2011. PMID: 20070325
-
[Transanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter trauma].Ginekol Pol. 2001 Jul;72(7):574-82. Ginekol Pol. 2001. PMID: 11599241 Review. Polish.
-
Diagnosing and managing faecal incontinence.Ann Acad Med Singap. 1999 May;28(3):417-23. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1999. PMID: 10575529 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship Among Anal Sphincter Injury, Patulous Anal Canal, and Anal Pressures in Patients With Anorectal Disorders.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1793-1800.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Apr 11. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25869638 Free PMC article.
-
Sphincter damage during fistulotomy for perianal fistulae and its relationship with faecal incontinence.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2497-2505. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02307-5. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021. PMID: 34468863 Free PMC article.
-
Hypothesized summative anal physiology score correlates but poorly predicts incontinence severity.World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 21;23(31):5732-5738. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5732. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28883698 Free PMC article.
-
Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Feb;25(2):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0830-z. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010. PMID: 19902225
-
Quantifying the extent of fistulotomy. How much sphincter can we safely divide? A three-dimensional endosonographic study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;27(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1437-3. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 22418879
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources