Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;18(5):343-9.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20522.x.

Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act

Affiliations

Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act

David W Baker et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and mortality rates following a DNR order after the Patient Self-determination Act (PSDA) was implemented in December 1991.

Design: Time-series.

Setting: Twenty-nine hospitals in Northeast Ohio.

Patients/participants: Medicare patients (N = 91,539) hospitalized with myocardial infarction, heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, or stroke.

Measurements and main results: The use of "early" (first 2 hospital days) and "late" DNR orders was determined from chart abstractions. Deaths within 30 days after a DNR order were identified from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Risk-adjusted rates of early DNR orders increased by 34% to 66% between 1991 and 1992 for 4 of the 6 conditions and then remained flat or declined slightly between 1992 and 1997. Use of late DNR orders declined by 29% to 53% for 4 of the 6 conditions between 1991 and 1997. Risk-adjusted mortality during the 30 days after a DNR order was written did not change between 1991 and 1997 for 5 conditions, but risk-adjusted mortality increased by 21% and 25% for stroke patients with early DNR and late DNR orders, respectively.

Conclusions: Overall use of DNR orders changed relatively little after passage of the PSDA, because the increase in the use of early DNR orders between 1991 and 1992 was counteracted by decreasing use of late DNR orders. Risk-adjusted mortality rates after a DNR order generally remained stable, suggesting that there were no dramatic changes in quality of care or aggressiveness of care for patients with DNR orders. However, the increasing mortality for stroke patients warrants further examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trends for mean admission severity of illness for patients who had a do-not-resuscitate order written on the first or second hospital day. Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GI, gastrointestinal. Mean severity of illness is based on the estimated risk of death within 30 days after admission.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wenger NS, Pearson ML, Desmond KA, Kahn KL. Changes over time in the use of do not resuscitate orders and the outcomes of patients receiving them. Med Care. 1997;35:311–9. - PubMed
    1. Jayes RL, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Knaus WA. Do-not-resuscitate orders in intensive care units. Current practices and recent changes. JAMA. 1993;270:2213–7. - PubMed
    1. Jonsson PV, Mc Namee M, Campion EW. The ‘do not resuscitate’ order. A profile of its changing use. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:2373–5. - PubMed
    1. Stern SG, Orlowski JP. DNR or CPR–the choice is ours. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:1263–72. - PubMed
    1. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. Public law no. 101–508. 2002. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms