Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication
- PMID: 12795738
- PMCID: PMC1494854
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20627.x
Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication
Abstract
To assess physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail (e-mail) for patient communication, we conducted a mail-in survey of physicians who see patients in outpatient clinics affiliated with a large academic medical center (N = 283). Seventy-two percent of physicians reported using e-mail to communicate with patients, averaging 7.7 e-mails from patients per month. The lowest level of use was by community-based primary care physicians (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.59). Those physicians who reported using e-mail with patients reported high satisfaction with its use. Although physicians were concerned about the confidentiality of e-mail, few discussed this issue with patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Sep;18(9):736-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12950483 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients.Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Oct;(134):1-5. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010. PMID: 20939158
-
Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care.Am J Manag Care. 2002 May;8(5):427-33. Am J Manag Care. 2002. PMID: 12019595
-
Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities.Fam Pract. 2016 Apr;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv101. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Fam Pract. 2016. PMID: 26711957 Review.
-
Patient-physician e-mail: passion or fashion?Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2003 Jul-Sep;22(3):265-74. doi: 10.1097/00126450-200307000-00012. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2003. PMID: 12956229 Review.
Cited by
-
Online medicine for pregnant women.Int J Telemed Appl. 2014;2014:379427. doi: 10.1155/2014/379427. Epub 2014 Jul 13. Int J Telemed Appl. 2014. PMID: 25132848 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Online Access to Their Primary Care Electronic Health Records and Linked Online Services: Implications for Research and Practice.J Pers Med. 2015 Dec 4;5(4):452-69. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040452. J Pers Med. 2015. PMID: 26690225 Free PMC article.
-
E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038. Epub 2009 Nov 13. Patient Educ Couns. 2010. PMID: 19914022 Free PMC article.
-
Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives.J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jun 15;12(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1281. J Med Internet Res. 2010. PMID: 20551011 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of a secure email reminder system for colorectal cancer screening.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:457-61. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009. PMID: 20351899 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Nielsen Net Ratings. Web usage. Available at: http://209.249.142.27/nnpm/owa/NRpublicreports.usageweekly. Accessed September 5, 2002.
-
- Coile RC., Jr The digital transformation of health care. Physician Exec. 2000;26:8–15. - PubMed
-
- Sands DZ. Electronic patient-centered communication: managing risks, managing opportunities, managing care. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1569–71. - PubMed
-
- Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Brandt AM. Electronic patient-physician communication: problems and promise. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:495–500. - PubMed
-
- Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1998;280:1353–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical