Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group
- PMID: 12796019
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260
Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.
Patients and methods: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles.
Results: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths.
Conclusions: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.
Similar articles
-
Adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast carcinoma.Cancer. 2000 Dec 15;89(12):2521-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2521::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-f. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 11135211 Clinical Trial.
-
Sixteen years follow-up results of a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in stage III breast cancer: GOCS experience.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jan;143(2):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2806-5. Epub 2013 Dec 11. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014. PMID: 24327333 Clinical Trial.
-
Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2593-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9841. Epub 2013 Jun 3. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23733779 Clinical Trial.
-
Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-positive breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.CMAJ. 1998 Feb 10;158 Suppl 3:S52-64. CMAJ. 1998. PMID: 9484279
-
Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-negative breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.CMAJ. 1998 Feb 10;158 Suppl 3:S43-51. CMAJ. 1998. PMID: 9484278
Cited by
-
Cardiac toxicity of anticancer agents.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 May;15(5):362. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0362-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23512625 Review.
-
Circadian rhythm of dihydrouracil/uracil ratios in biological fluids: a potential biomarker for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase levels.Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;141(4):616-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705651. Epub 2004 Jan 26. Br J Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 14744810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of taxanes as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Jul;13(7):485-98. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0686-x. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21775276 Review.
-
Methotrexate inhibits the viability of human melanoma cell lines and enhances Fas/Fas-ligand expression, apoptosis and response to interferon-alpha: rationale for its use in combination therapy.Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014 Dec 1;563:101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 23. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014. PMID: 24862567 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Survival Benefit of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with T1-2N0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.J Breast Cancer. 2015 Sep;18(3):271-8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.3.271. Epub 2015 Sep 24. J Breast Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26472978 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical