Randomized phase II study of daily versus continuous-infusion schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancers
- PMID: 12796591
- DOI: 10.1097/01.COC.0000018038.28645.46
Randomized phase II study of daily versus continuous-infusion schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancers
Abstract
A randomized two-stage, phase II study was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of two different schedules of topotecan in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in chemotherapy-naive patients. A total of 40 eligible patients were randomized to receive either the daily schedule, with topotecan being administered intravenously at 1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, or the continuous-infusion schedule, with topotecan administered intravenously at a dosage of 1.3 mg/m2 per day over 72 hours every 4 weeks. Randomization to the continuous-infusion schedule was discontinued due to inactivity, and an additional 20 patients were treated on the daily schedule. Patients received an average of 5 courses (range: 1-13) of the daily schedule compared to an average of 2 courses (range: 1-7) of the continuous-infusion schedule (p < 0.01). Confirmed response rates for the daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 62.5% (90% CI: 49-75%) and 15% (90% CI: 1-29%), respectively. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 92% (55/60) having greater than or equal to grade III neutropenia and 58% (35/60) reporting greater than or equal to grade III leukopenia for both IV schedules. Nonhematologic toxicity was very mild, with only 10% (6/60) patients experiencing grade IV toxicities. One patient died of infection on the continuous-infusion arm. Median times to progression for the daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 5 months (90% CI: 4.4-7.2) and 2 months (90% CI: 1.1-2.1), respectively. Estimated 1-year survival rates for patients receiving daily and continuous-infusion schedules are 63% (90% CI: 51-76%) and 55% (90% CI: 39-77%), respectively. Fifty percent (30/60) of patients received second-line therapy with etoposide and cisplatin. Forty-three percent (13/30) of patients who received second-line therapy achieved a confirmed response. Topotecan showed significant activity in the treatment of extensive stage SCLC when administered as a brief daily IV repeated every 3 weeks.
Similar articles
-
A Phase I-II study of sequential administration of topotecan and oral etoposide (toposiomerase I and II inhibitors) in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma.Cancer. 2002 Oct 1;95(7):1511-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10836. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12237920 Clinical Trial.
-
European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) 08957 phase II study of topotecan in combination with cisplatin as second-line treatment of refractory and sensitive small cell lung cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1):143-50. Clin Cancer Res. 2003. PMID: 12538462 Clinical Trial.
-
Topotecan and etoposide as first-line therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of a platinum-free regimen.Lung Cancer. 2005 Jun;48(3):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.11.013. Epub 2005 Jan 23. Lung Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15893010 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of topotecan in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma.Semin Oncol. 1997 Feb;24(1 Suppl 5):S5-19-S5-25. Semin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9122738 Review.
-
Paclitaxel-based three-drug combinations for the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a review of the Sarah Cannon Cancer Center experience.Semin Oncol. 2001 Apr;28(2 Suppl 4):43-7. Semin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11479897 Review.
Cited by
-
Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul;10(7):1099-106. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000548. J Thorac Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26134227 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review.Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):e372-e384. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4481. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Curr Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31285682 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors differ by tumor stage for small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials.Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;115(12):2721-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24314. Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19402175 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor response and progression-free survival as potential surrogate endpoints for overall survival in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: findings on the basis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials.Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;117(6):1262-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25526. Epub 2010 Oct 19. Cancer. 2011. PMID: 20960500 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical