Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Jul;170(1):12-9.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072200.22089.c3.

Histological changes of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: clinical implications

Affiliations
Review

Histological changes of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: clinical implications

Benjamin T Larson et al. J Urol. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is near universal in aging men, creating tremendous costs in morbidity and surgical treatment. In the last decade numerous nonsurgical minimally invasive methods have emerged for ablation of prostatic tissue.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the recently published English language literature on minimally invasive techniques for treating BPH and cancer with an emphasis on histopathological findings.

Results: We compared the spectrum of contemporary minimally invasive treatments for BPH and cancer, with an emphasis on histopathological results. Clinical results were summarized briefly for each treatment method. These procedures ablate tissue by thermal, cryogenic, chemical or enzymatic injury. The 5-year results for some techniques were promising, although long-term durability is still uncertain, and other methods were in preclinical or early clinical stages. Invariably the treated tissue was devitalized with a thin border of granulation tissue and fibrosis. These procedures have applications for BPH and prostate cancer, although some studies are limited to only 1 disease.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive procedures show promise of a durable replacement for surgical resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by