Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jun;110(6):593-7.

The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 12798478
Clinical Trial

The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy

Warwick Giles et al. BJOG. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the addition value of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound added to standard ultrasound biometry measurements in the management of twin pregnancies.

Design: A prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial of women with twin pregnancies.

Setting: Tertiary level referral hospitals in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia.

Population: Pregnant women with twin pregnancies.

Methods: Women were randomised at 25 weeks of gestation to receive either standard ultrasound biometric assessment or standard assessment plus Doppler ultrasound umbilical artery flow velocity waveform analysis. The studies were repeated at 30 and 35 weeks unless otherwise indicated. Physicians were advised to institute close fetal surveillance in the presence of an abnormal umbilical artery Doppler study or with biometry indicators of fetal compromise.

Main outcome measures: Standard obstetric (mode of delivery, perinatal mortality, hypertension, antenatal admissions and gestation at delivery) and neonatal (5 minute Apgar scores <5, admissions to neonatal nursery and requirements for ventilation) outcomes and statistical analysis was on intention-to-treat. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to demography, antenatal, peripartum and neonatal outcomes. There was no difference in the perinatal mortality rate in the no Doppler group (n = 264), which was 11/1000 live births, and the Doppler group (n = 262), which was 9/1000 live births. There were three unexplained intrauterine deaths in the no Doppler group and none in the Doppler group (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-1.31). Two intrauterine deaths in the Doppler group were due to cord prolapse in labour and a fetomaternal haemorrhage, both very unlikely to be influenced by Doppler surveillance.

Conclusions: In this study, close surveillance in twin pregnancy resulted in a lower than expected fetal mortality from 25 weeks of gestation in both the no Doppler and Doppler groups. The lower rate of unexplained fetal death in the no Doppler group was not significantly different from the Doppler group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources