Quality of life associated with visual loss: a time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states
- PMID: 12799229
- DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00254-9
Quality of life associated with visual loss: a time tradeoff utility analysis comparison with medical health states
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the visual utility values of patients with ocular disease and to compare these values with those of patients with systemic health states
Design: Cross-sectional utility value assessment.
Methods: Consecutive patients with ophthalmic diseases were interviewed in a one-on-one fashion using a standardized time tradeoff utility value assessment form. These values were compared with utility values for systemic health states present in the literature.
Intervention: None.
Main outcome measure: Time tradeoff utility value on a scale ranging from 1.0 (perfect visual health) to 0.0 (death). The ophthalmic patient groups were stratified into 4 visual groups dependent on the visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. The groups were as follows: group 1, 20/20 to 20/25; group 2, 20/30 to 20/50; group 3, 20/60 to 20/100; group 4, 20/200 to no light perception.
Results: A total of 500 subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean utility values for the visually stratified groups were: group 1, 0.88; group 2, 0.81; group 3, 0.72; group 4, 0.61. Comparable respective systemic health state utility values for each of the ophthalmic groups were: diabetes mellitus, status after kidney transplantation, moderate stroke, and moderately severe stroke.
Conclusions: Visual loss is associated with a substantial and measurable diminution in quality of life. This diminution in quality of life can be directly compared with that induced by systemic health states.
Similar articles
-
Vision and quality-of-life.Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:473-511. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999. PMID: 10703139 Free PMC article.
-
TTO utility scores measure quality of life in patients with visual morbidity due to diabetic retinopathy or ARMD.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;11(1):43-51. doi: 10.1076/opep.11.1.43.26436. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 14977496
-
The reproducibility of ophthalmic utility values.Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:199-203; discussion 203-4. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001. PMID: 11797307 Free PMC article.
-
Preference-based quality of life measures in people with visual impairment.Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):809-16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181337638. Optom Vis Sci. 2007. PMID: 17700344 Review.
-
Health utility values associated with diabetic retinopathy.Diabet Med. 2008 May;25(5):618-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02430.x. Epub 2008 Mar 13. Diabet Med. 2008. PMID: 18346157 Review.
Cited by
-
Low vision services: a practical guide for the clinician.Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 11;10:2515841418776264. doi: 10.1177/2515841418776264. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29998224 Free PMC article.
-
How much blue light should an IOL transmit?Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;87(12):1523-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.12.1523. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 14660465 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of refractive errors in Tibetan adolescents.BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 May 11;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0780-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29747615 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;155(1):45-53.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Sep 8. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 22967866 Free PMC article.
-
Sociodemographic and health behavioural factors associated with access to and utilisation of eye care in Korea: Korea Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2012.BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 16;5(7):e007614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007614. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26185177 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical