Simplified gram stain interpretive method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
- PMID: 1279973
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91617-2
Simplified gram stain interpretive method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
Abstract
Objective: Two methods which only consider bacterial morphotypes and require counting various types of bacteria, for interpreting Gram stains of vaginal secretions for the purpose of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis were previously described. A new interpretative method, which combines clue cells with bacterial morphotypes as diagnostic markers, is offered.
Study design: One hundred twenty patients were tested with the new interpretative method and clinical criteria of bacterial vaginosis as the reference standard.
Results: The new method was found comparable to older methods when all were compared with clinical diagnostic methods. The sensitivity of the clue cell method was 86.1% and the specificity was 92.8%. The predictive value of a positive test was 83.7% for a population with a prevalence of bacterial vaginosis of 30%. The negative predictive value was 94.0%.
Conclusion: If clue cells are present and the nonlactobacilli morphotypes exceed lactobacilli morphotypes, bacterial vaginosis can be diagnosed without the need for exact bacterial counts.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;54(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.017. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16427240
-
Improving Gram-stained reproducible result by further adding clue cells in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2002 Apr;18(4):164-70. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2002. PMID: 12164009
-
Relation between Gram-stain and clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis with special reference to Gram grade II evaluation.Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Jan;14(1):6-10. doi: 10.1258/095646203321043183. Int J STD AIDS. 2003. PMID: 12590785 Clinical Trial.
-
Bacterial vaginosis: an update on diagnosis and treatment.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Nov;7(9):1109-24. doi: 10.1586/eri.09.87. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009. PMID: 19883331 Review.
-
Diagnostic microbiology of bacterial vaginosis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 2):455-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90340-o. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8357044 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection of Methanobrevibacter smithii in vaginal samples collected from women diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;38(9):1643-1649. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03592-1. Epub 2019 May 24. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31127480
-
Comparison between Gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora.BMC Microbiol. 2005 Oct 14;5:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-5-61. BMC Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16225680 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2002;10(4):203-7. doi: 10.1155/S1064744902000236. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 12648314 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics.Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Dec;78(6):413-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.6.413. Sex Transm Infect. 2002. PMID: 12473800 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of a rapid Gram stain interpretation method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):1139-40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1139-1140.2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16517914 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical