Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jul;29(7):1169-72.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1803-2. Epub 2003 Jun 12.

Cefazolin does not accelerate gastric emptying in the critically ill

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cefazolin does not accelerate gastric emptying in the critically ill

M Chapman et al. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intravenous cefazolin on gastric emptying measured by the C-13 octanoic acid breath test.

Design: Prospective, double-blind, cross-over, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Mixed multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital.

Patients: Fourteen critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

Interventions: After a 4-h fast patients received either 50 mg cefazolin or 20 ml saline over 20 min immediately prior to measurement of gastric emptying. The next day the study was repeated with the alternative therapy.

Measurements and results: Breath samples were analysed for the concentration of (13)CO2 by mass spectrometer, and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) and half-emptying time (t(50)) were calculated. Results are mean (standard deviation). Data were analysed with the paired t-test (saline vs cefazolin). Two patients were excluded for technical problems. Twelve patients remained (six male/six female), aged 57 (+/-16) years, with an APACHE II score of 20 (+/-8). Both GEC and t(50) were unchanged after administration of cefazolin compared with placebo (t(50) cefazolin, 138 (+/-54) vs saline 122 (+/-46) min, P=0.32; GEC cefazolin 3.27 (+/-0.83) vs saline 3.55 (+/-0.6), P=0.24). Two patients had abnormal t(50) after saline and five after cefazolin. There was no order effect of the study day.

Conclusion: In mechanically ventilated patients, cefazolin had no effect on gastric emptying. These data do not support the use of low-dose cefazolin as a pro-kinetic agent in critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Dec;29(6):619-22 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1993 Jan;34(1):33-7 - PubMed
    1. Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;131(3):399-404 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1994 May;35(5):824-31 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Jul;103(1):114-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources