Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male subfertility
- PMID: 12804403
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301
Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male subfertility
Update in
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 15;8(8):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37581383 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) as treatment for male factor subfertility is associated with lower fertilisation and pregnancy rates than for other indications. Since the late 1980s several assisted fertilisation techniques have emerged and have been rapidly developed to try to enhance results for couples with male factor subfertility, or to help couples with severe male factor for whom conventional IVF was not possible. The techniques of partial zona dissection (PZD) and of subzonal microinjection of spermatozoa into the perivitelline space (SUZI) are by far surpassed by the technique of intra-cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI). ICSI has proven to be the therapy of choice for couples with severe male factor subfertility.
Objectives: To investigate whether ICSI improves livebirth rate in comparison to IVF in couples with non-male subfertility.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched 30 May 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002), PubMed (January 1992 to July 2002) and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria: Trials were included if they compared the effects of these techniques on livebirths, pregnancy and fertilisation outcomes. Only randomised studies were included in this review.
Data collection and analysis: One study met the inclusion criteria for this review. The study compared ICSI with IVF within couples with non-male infertility. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers.
Main results: There were no randomised data comparing livebirth rates. The single identified study did not find a difference in pregnancy rates (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.2). There were no randomised data on miscarriage rates, or on other adverse events such as congenital malformations that may be of concern.
Reviewer's conclusions: Whether ICSI should be preferred to IVF for cases of non-male factor subfertility remains an open question. Further research should report livebirth rates and adverse events.
Update of
-
Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus partial zona dissection, subzonal insemination and conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301. PMID: 10796764 Updated.
Similar articles
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 15;8(8):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37581383 Free PMC article.
-
Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus partial zona dissection, subzonal insemination and conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301. PMID: 10796764 Updated.
-
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub2. PMID: 12076476 Updated.
-
Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub3. PMID: 15495053 Updated.
-
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub3. PMID: 15846658 Updated.
Cited by
-
Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD010537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010537.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30117155 Free PMC article.
-
ICSI does not offer any benefit over conventional IVF across different ovarian response categories in non-male factor infertility: a European multicenter analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):2067-2076. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01563-1. Epub 2019 Aug 22. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019. PMID: 31440957 Free PMC article.
-
Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Sep;28(10):911-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9614-9. Epub 2011 Jul 27. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011. PMID: 21792665 Free PMC article.
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 15;8(8):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37581383 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011.Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):1041-1047.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.043. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 25086790 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous